Revision summary
The case joins ten years of pollution, a forced closure and sudden unemployment. Reopening without cleanup repeats the original wrong; closure without worker and site plans creates a second wrong. The officer should run health and water relief, polluter-pays remediation, labour dues, and lawful help for ancillary firms. A restart, if any, needs a new environmental process away from the city's water. Police excess and environmental crime are two files, both to be tried.
Model answer
Introduction
The plant bought time with a political yes and paid in poisoned land, water, bodies and a riot. Closure without a second plan now poisons livelihoods. The job is to hold both harms in one file.
Body
Stakeholders
- Residents, farmers and animals living with effluent, and those injured in the agitation.
- Permanent and contract workers of the unit and of ancillary shops.
- Downstream industries that used the chemicals.
- The company, its directors, and lenders.
- The State government that permitted and then closed the unit.
- Pollution Control Board, health and labour departments, and you as the coordinating officer.
- Future investors, who will read whether the State is lawless, captured, or merely chaotic.
Ethical issues and values
- Right to health and a decent environment (Article 21 as interpreted in environmental cases) versus the right to livelihood.
- Polluter-pays and inter-generational justice: ten years of gain cannot exit as a private profit and a public ruin.
- Non-violence and police ethics: stern action in a crowd does not erase the duty to find who poisoned the water.
- Legal certainty: a permission that ignored other States' environmental no is a past wrong; a sudden closure that dumps workers is a present wrong.
- Integrity: do not reopen the tap as a favour, and do not use "jobs" as a shield for ongoing toxin.
Options
- Option 1: Immediate silent reopening to calm unemployment.
- Merit: wages restart.
- Demerit: repeats the original capture; more disease. Rejected until compliance is real.
- Option 2: Permanent lock, no remediation, no worker plan.
- Merit: looks green.
- Demerit: leaves a toxic site and a hungry ring of towns; anger will return.
- Option 3: Closure stays for unsafe processes; time-bound remediation; worker protection; lawful relocation or clean restart only after independent clearance.
- Merit: both life and livelihood.
- Demerit: costs money and political patience.
Action
- Health first: survey, treatment camps, safe water tankers, and a public register of illness without intimidating complainants.
- Environment: independent sampling of soil, aquifers and crops; a remediation order on the company under polluter-pays, with bank guarantees, not a taxpayer-only clean-up.
- Liability: preserve evidence for the National Green Tribunal and criminal provisions where they apply; directors do not hide behind a padlock.
- Labour: enforce closure compensation, provident fund and gratuity; notify all units; run a placement cell with skills that match the district, not a pamphlet.
- Ancillary and downstream firms: a time-bound input-substitution plan, lawful import windows if essential, and credit support through existing MSME instruments — not a secret permission to dump again.
- If a clean technology restart is scientifically possible far from the aquifer and the city, it must pass a fresh environmental process, not a ministerial phone call.
- Police: inquire excess in the agitation separately from the environmental crime so that neither file kills the other.
- Communication: publish timelines. Silence is how rumours of both "sell-out" and "job murder" grow.
- Lesson to government: site clearance is not a competitive gift to the one State willing to look away.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD POL[Pollution and closure] --> HEALTH[Treat people and water] POL --> PAY[Polluter pays remediation] POL --> JOB[Compensation and reskilling] REOPEN[Silent reopen] --> REPEAT[Repeat harm] CLEAN[Fresh independent clearance] --> MAYBE[Possible clean restart]
Conclusion
Keep the unsafe plant closed. Make the polluter pay to heal land and bodies. Pay and re-skill workers. Allow a restart only through a clean, distant, independently cleared process. Jobs are not a solvent for toxin.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. Dr. X is a leading medical practitioner in a city. He has set up a charitable trust through which he plans to establish a super-specialty hospital in the city to cater to the medical needs of all sections of society. Incidentally, that part of the State had been neglected over the years. The proposed hospital would be a boon for the region. You are heading the tax investigation agency of that region. During an inspection of the doctor's clinic, your officers have found out some major irregularities. A few of them are substantial which had resulted in considerable withholding of tax that should be paid by him now. The doctor is cooperative. He undertakes to pay the tax immediately. However, there are certain other deficiencies in his tax compliance that are purely technical in nature. If these technical defaults are pursued by the agency, considerable time and energy of the doctor will be diverted to issues that are not so serious, urgent, or even helpful to the tax collection process. Further, in all probability, it will hamper the prospects of the hospital coming up. There are two options before you: Taking a broader view, ensuring substantial tax compliance, and ignoring defaults that are merely technical in nature. Pursue the matter strictly and proceed on all fronts, whether substantial or merely technical. As the head of the tax agency, which course of action will you opt for and why? (250 words).
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q11). View answer →
-
Can unemployment justify running the plant a few more months?
Not if effluent is still injuring bodies. Bridge livelihoods with dues, relief and placement; do not use workers as human shields for toxin.
-
Is the original permission now irrelevant because ten years passed?
No. Past capture explains the harm and supports restoration and penalty. It does not authorise a second capture in the name of jobs.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q7 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Edward Snowden, a computer expert, and former CIA administrator, released confidential Government documents to the press about the existence of Government surveillance programmes. According to many legal experts and the US Government, his action violated the Espionage act of 1971, which identified the leak of State secrets as an act of treason. Yet, despite the fact that he broke the law, Snowden argued that he had a moral obligation to act. He gave a justification for his "whistleblowing" by stating that he had a duty "to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them." According to Snowden, the Government's violation of privacy had to be exposed regardless of legality since more substantive issues of social action and public morality were involved here. Many agreed with Snowden. Few argued that he broke the law and compromised national security, for which he should be held accountable. Do you agree that Snowden's actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited? Why or why not? Make an argument by weighing the competing values in this case. (250 words). -
2018 · Q8 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Rakesh is a responsible district-level officer, who enjoys the trust of his higher officials. Knowing his honesty, the government entrusted him with the responsibility of identifying the beneficiaries under a health care scheme meant for senior citizens. The criteria to be a beneficiary are the following: (a) 60 years of age or above. (b) Belonging to a reserved community. (c) Family income of less than 1 Lakh rupees per annum. (d) Post-treatment prognosis is likely to be high to make a positive difference to the quality of life of the beneficiary. One day, an old couple visited Rakesh's office with their application. They have been the residents of a village in his district since their birth. The old man is diagnosed with a rare condition that causes obstruction in the large intestine. As a consequence, he has severe abdominal pain frequently that prevents him from doing any physical labour. The couple has no children to support them. The expert surgeon whom they contacted is willing to do the surgery without charging any fee. However, the couple will have to bear the cost of incidental charges, such as medicines, hospitalization, etc., to the tune of rupees one lakh. The couple fulfills all the criteria except criterion 'b'. However, any financial aid would certainly make a significant difference in their quality of life. How should Rakesh respond to the situation? (250 words). -
2018 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. It is a State where prohibition is in force. You are recently appointed as the Superintendent of Police of a district notorious for illicit distillation of liquor. The illicit liquor leads to many death, reported and unreported, and causes a major problem for the district authorities. The approach till now had been to view it as a law and order problem and tackle it accordingly. Raids, arrests, police cases, and criminal trials - all these had only limited impact. The problem remains as serious as ever. Your inspections show that the parts of the district where the distillation flourishes are economically, industrially, and educationally backward. Agriculture is badly affected by poor irrigation facilities. Frequent clashes among communities gave a boost to illicit distillation. No major initiatives had taken place in the past either from the government's side or from social organizations to improve a lot of the people. Which new approach will you adopt to bring the problem under control? (250 words). -
2018 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Dr. X is a leading medical practitioner in a city. He has set up a charitable trust through which he plans to establish a super-specialty hospital in the city to cater to the medical needs of all sections of society. Incidentally, that part of the State had been neglected over the years. The proposed hospital would be a boon for the region. You are heading the tax investigation agency of that region. During an inspection of the doctor's clinic, your officers have found out some major irregularities. A few of them are substantial which had resulted in considerable withholding of tax that should be paid by him now. The doctor is cooperative. He undertakes to pay the tax immediately. However, there are certain other deficiencies in his tax compliance that are purely technical in nature. If these technical defaults are pursued by the agency, considerable time and energy of the doctor will be diverted to issues that are not so serious, urgent, or even helpful to the tax collection process. Further, in all probability, it will hamper the prospects of the hospital coming up. There are two options before you: Taking a broader view, ensuring substantial tax compliance, and ignoring defaults that are merely technical in nature. Pursue the matter strictly and proceed on all fronts, whether substantial or merely technical. As the head of the tax agency, which course of action will you opt for and why? (250 words). -
2018 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. As a senior officer in the Ministry, you have access to important policy decisions and upcoming big announcements such as road construction projects before they are notified in the public domain. The Ministry is about to announce a mega road project for which the drawings are already in place. Sufficient care was taken by the planners to make use of the government land with the minimum land acquisition from private parties. The compensation rate for private parties was also finalized as per government rules. Care was also taken to minimize deforestation. Once the project is announced, it is expected that there will be a huge spurt in real estate prices in and around that area. Meanwhile, the Minister concerned insists that you realign the road in such a way that it comes closer to his 20 acres farmhouse. He also suggests that he would facilitate the purchase of a big plot of land in your wife's name at the prevailing rate which is very nominal, in and around the proposed mega road project. He also tries to convince you by saying that there is no harm in it as he is buying the land legally. He even promises to supplement your savings in case you do not have sufficient funds to buy the land. However, by the act of realignment, a lot of agricultural lands have to be acquired, thereby causing a considerable financial burden on the government, and also the displacement of the farmers. As if this is not enough, it will involve cutting down of a large number of trees denuding the area of its green cover. Faced with this situation, what will you do? Critically examine various conflicts of interest and explain what your responsibilities are as a public servant. (250 words). -
2017 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A building permitted for three floors, while being extended illegally to 6 floors by a builder, collapses. As a consequence, a number of innocent labourers including women and children died. These labourers are migrants of different places. The government immediately announced cash relief to the aggrieved families and arrested the builder. Give reasons for such incidents taking place across the country. Suggest measures to prevent their occurrence. -
2017 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are an honest and responsible civil servant. You often observe the following: (a) There is a general perception that adhering to ethical conduct one may face difficulties to oneself and cause problems for the family, whereas unfair practices may help to reach the career goals. (b) When the number of people adopting unfair means is large, a small minority having a penchant towards ethical means makes no difference. (c) Sticking to ethical means is detrimental to the larger developmental goals (d) While one may not involve oneself in large unethical practices, but giving and accepting small gifts makes the system more efficient. Examine the above statements with their merits and demerits. -
2017 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are aspiring to become an IAS officer and you have cleared various stages and now you have been selected for the personal interview. On the day of the interview, on the way to the venue you saw an accident where a mother and child who happen to be your relatives were badly injured. They needed immediate help. What would you have done in such a situation? Justify your action.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) State the three basic values, universal in nature, in the context of civil services and bring out their importance. (b) Distinguish between "Code of ethics" and "Code of conduct" with suitable examples.
Probity in Governance
The three universal civil-service values are integrity, impartiality and objectivity. Integrity is honest trusteeship; impartiality is equal treatment; objectivity is fact-and-law decisions with recorded reasons. They matter because public money, Article 14 equality and a file that can face a court all depend on them. A code of ethics states values; a code of conduct lists punishable do's and don'ts. Nolan and the Second ARC illustrate ethics; the CCS Conduct Rules, 1964 illustrate conduct.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What is meant by public interest? What are the principles and procedures to be followed by the civil servants in public interest? (b) "The Right to Information Act is not all about citizens' empowerment alone, it essentially redefines the concept of accountability. Discuss.
Probity in Governance
Public interest is the welfare of the whole community under the Constitution, not popularity or official prestige. Civil servants serve it through legality, impartiality, proportionality, recorded reasons, published criteria and a preference for the weakest. Upward reporting is not enough if the file stays secret. The RTI Act, 2005 empowers citizens to seek information and redefines accountability as an answer owed to the public. Suo motu disclosure, time limits and the Information Commission make that new accountability real, though exemptions and fear still weaken it.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS IV · 10 marks
(a) What is meant by conflict of interest? Illustrate with examples, the difference between the actual and potential conflicts of interest. (b) "In looking for people to hire, you look for three qualities: integrity, intelligence and energy. And if they do not have the first, the other two will kill you." - Warren Buffett What do you understand by this statement in the present-day scenario? Explain.
Ethics in Public Administration
Conflict of interest is a private interest that can twist a public or fiduciary duty. Actual conflict is already operating on this decision; potential conflict is reasonably foreseeable even if today's file looks clean. The cure is disclosure, recusal, divestment and screens, not private hope. Buffett ranks integrity first because intelligence and energy multiply both service and fraud. Present-day scams, surveillance tools and mark-worshipping recruitment make that ranking more, not less, urgent.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.