Revision summary
Terrorism in India’s experience is networked, asymmetric, and often sanctuary-backed. Causes include ideology, alienation, and state sponsorship; poverty is soil, not destiny. The obnoxious nexus is narco, hawala, fake currency, arms, and sometimes political protection. Measures are intelligence, NIA/PMLA/FATF, border and cyber control, counter-radicalisation, and diplomacy against safe havens. Jobs and rights reduce recruits; they do not replace the need to stop the active cell.
Model answer
Introduction
Terrorism is the organised use of fear against civilians for a political, religious, or criminal aim. Its intensity in India’s neighbourhood has been high because ideology, territory, and crime share the same wallet. Eradication is a strong word. Reduction to a residual police problem is the practical goal, through law, money, and politics that do not feed the next recruiter.
Body
Complexity and intensity
- Terrorism is asymmetric: a small cell can shock a large democracy (Parliament 2001, 26/11, Pulwama).
- It is networked: local modules, diaspora money, online instruction, and sometimes a state sanctuary.
- Intensity in South Asia has included fidayeen, VBIEDs, and now drones and encrypted command, which raise the cost of policing.
- Multiple theatres overlap: J&K, Left-Wing Extremism (a different ideology, similar terror against civilians and the State), north-east remnants, and urban modules.
- The target set includes soft civilians, security forces, and symbols (temples, trains, hotels) to maximise publicity.
Causes
- Political: unresolved self-determination narratives, alienation, and governance failure that a handler can script.
- Ideological and religious extremist teaching, including imported takfiri streams and, in other cases, ethno-national militancy.
- Youth unemployment and humiliation as recruitment soil, not as a full cause — most poor people never bomb a market.
- State sponsorship and safe havens that turn a local grievance into a trained unit.
- Copy-cat media reward: the more the blast leads the news, the more the method spreads.
Linkages and obnoxious nexus
- Terror–crime: kidnapping, extortion, and bank robbery (classic LWE and insurgent finance).
- Terror–narco: Golden Crescent heroin and Afghan-era routes funding modules; drugs also hollow the society that must resist.
- Terror–hawala and fake currency: moving value without a clean bank trail.
- Terror–arms bazaars and leftover small arms after regional wars.
- Terror–cyber: recruitment, recon, and sometimes disruption.
- Obnoxious nexus with politics: when a party, a police unit, or a foreign desk uses a militant as an asset, the State fights itself.
Measures to reduce and, as far as possible, eradicate
- Intelligence-led policing, not only post-blast special laws: human sources, financial intelligence, and tech intercept with oversight.
- NIA, UAPA, PMLA, and UN 1267 listing to freeze people and money; courts that conclude trials so law is not only detention.
- Dry the nexus: FATF-standard KYC, narcotics control (NCB), and coastal/border interdiction.
- Counter-radicalisation in prisons, campuses, and online, with credible community voices — not only takedowns.
- Protect soft targets without turning cities into permanent fortresses: hotels, rail, and religious sites after 26/11 lessons.
- Diplomacy and, where needed, calibrated force against sanctuaries; no impunity for state sponsors.
- Address genuine grievances (jobs, rights, local government) so the political file is not empty. This is not a substitute for disrupting the bomb-maker.
- International: UN conventions, Interpol, and data-sharing; a common definition is still contested, but extradition of named accused is concrete.
- Strategic communication that denies theatre without hiding facts.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD C[Grievance ideology sanctuary] --> T[Terror modules] X[Narco hawala arms cyber] --> T T --> V[Civilian fear] M[Intel NIA PMLA FATF] --> R[Disrupt money and cells] P[Governance without impunity] --> R
Conclusion
Terrorism is intense because it mixes ideology, sanctuary, and a crime economy. India’s tools are intelligence, NIA and financial law, border and cyber work, and a politics that neither bargains with the gun nor ignores the grievance. Eradication is the aim; relentless reduction is the method.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Can terrorism be fully eradicated?
A modern society can drive it to a residual criminal level. Zero forever is a slogan. The operational aim is no sanctuaries and no successful modules.
-
Is talking to militants always appeasement?
Talking to a political constituency is not the same as licensing a fidayeen. The State can talk and still prosecute the bomb.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q9 · GS III · 10 marks
Explain how narco-terrorism has emerged as a serious threat across the country. Suggest suitable measures to counter narco-terrorism. -
2023 · Q9 · GS III · 10 marks
Winning of 'Hearts and Minds' in terrorism affected areas is an essential step in restoring the trust of the population. Discuss the measures adopted by the Government in this respect as part of the conflict resolution in Jammu and Kashmir. -
2023 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks
The use of unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVs) by our adversaries across the borders to ferry arms/ammunitions, drugs, etc., is a serious threat to the internal security. Comment on the measures being taken to tackle this threat. -
2022 · Q9 · GS III · 10 marks
Discuss the types of organised crimes. Describe the linkages between terrorists and organised crime that exist at the national and transnational levels. -
2020 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks
For effective border area management, discuss the steps required to be taken to deny local support to militants and also suggest ways to manage favourable perception among locals. -
2020 · Q20 · GS III · 15 marks
Analyse internal security threats and transborder crimes along Myanmar, Bangladesh and Pakistan borders including Line of Control (LoC). Also discuss the role played by various security forces in this regard. -
2019 · Q19 · GS III · 15 marks
Indian Government has recently strengthened the anti-terrorism laws by amending the unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967 and the NIA act. Analyze the changes in the context of prevailing security environment while discussing the scope and reasons for opposing the UAPA by human rights organizations. -
2019 · Q20 · GS III · 15 marks
Cross-Border movement of insurgents is only one of the several security challenges facing the policing of the border in North-East India. Examine the various challenges currently emanating across the India-Myanmar border. Also, discuss the steps to counter the challenges.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS III · 10 marks
Explain the difference between computing methodology of India's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) before the year 2015 and after the year 2015.
Indian Economy
The 2015 revision moved the base from 2004-05 to 2011-12 and replaced GDP at factor cost with GVA at basic prices. Headline GDP is at market prices, in line with SNA 2008. MCA21 and wider financial and local-body coverage changed what enters the total. New IIP and price deflators mean the series is not a relabelled old index. Debate on comparability is fair; a conspiracy reading is not.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS III · 10 marks
Distinguish between Capital Budget and Revenue Budget. Explain the components of both these Budgets.
Government Budgeting
Revenue Budget covers tax and non-tax receipts and spending that does not create assets. Capital Budget covers borrowings, disinvestment, loan recoveries, and asset-creating outlays. Salaries, interest, and subsidies sit on the revenue side; roads, equity, and loans sit on the capital side. A revenue deficit means borrowing to consume, not only to invest. FRBM reading needs both splits, not a single deficit number.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS III · 10 marks
How did land reforms in some parts of the country help to improve the socio-economic conditions of marginal and small farmers ?
Crops, Irrigation and Marketing
Serious land reform meant title and recorded tenancy, not only ceiling statutes. West Bengal’s Operation Barga and Kerala’s tenancy-homestead path lifted small-farmer security and credit. Gains included investment, bargaining power, and a rural political voice. Most States failed on ceilings and left benami holdings intact. Title is a floor for welfare; markets and water still decide today’s income.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.