Revision summary
Collective responsibility, questions, money votes, CAG audit and the PAC are the core accountability tools. PAC, usually Opposition-chaired, is the sharpest regular fiscal check on the executive. Disruptions, the Tenth Schedule whip, ordinances and thin committee reference reduce daily control. Parliament can still unseat a government and expose waste; it is not a rubber stamp, and it is not a full-time scrutineer either. Protecting Question Hour and default committee scrutiny would widen the extent without rewriting the Constitution.
Model answer
Introduction
- Parliamentary accountability of the executive is written into the Constitution: collective responsibility, questions, money votes, and audit. In practice the tools still work, but disruptions, a tight whip, and ordinance politics have narrowed the extent to which the House actually holds the government to account.
Body
Formal tools that still bite
- Article 75 makes the Council of Ministers collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha; a confidence vote remains the ultimate sanction.
- Question Hour, Zero Hour, calling attention, and adjournment motions force ministers onto the record; departmental standing committees examine Demands for Grants and bills when the House itself is short of time.
- The Comptroller and Auditor General under Article 148 audits Union accounts; the Public Accounts Committee, traditionally chaired by an Opposition member, examines CAG reports and can summon officials, which is the hardest regular fiscal check.
- The Estimates Committee and the Committee on Public Undertakings complete the financial triad; budget cut motions and the need for appropriation still legally bind the executive.
Where the extent falls short
- Frequent adjournments and walkouts shrink Question Hour, which is the daily accountability device the citizen actually sees.
- The anti-defection Tenth Schedule whip reduces intra-party dissent, so the House often debates as two blocs rather than as a scrutineer of departments.
- Ordinances under Article 123, delayed laying of reports, and a packed legislative calendar mean many statutes pass with thin clause-by-clause debate.
- Money bills and hybrid finance bills have been used in ways that limit Rajya Sabha’s role, which weakens bicameral check even when the Lok Sabha majority is firm.
A balanced extent
- Parliament can still unseat a government, stall a bill, and shame a ministry through PAC and CAG; that is more than a rubber stamp.
- Recommendation: protect Question Hour in the rule book, time-bind PAC action-taken reports, and refer more bills to committees as the default, not as a favour.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Executive] --> L[Lok Sabha confidence Art 75] E --> Q[Question Hour and debates] CAG[CAG Art 148] --> PAC[Public Accounts Committee] PAC --> E Q --> E L --> E
Conclusion
- Parliament is able to ensure executive accountability to a real but incomplete extent: CAG and PAC, confidence votes, and the budget still constrain the government, while disruptions, the whip, and ordinance practice blunt daily control. The design is strong; the working year of the House decides how much of that design the citizen gets.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Pressure groups play a vital role in influencing public policy making in India." Explain how the business associations contribute to public policies.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is the Rajya Sabha irrelevant to executive accountability?
No. It questions, debates and delays ordinary bills. Confidence and money, however, sit in the Lok Sabha, which is why the extent is lopsided by design.
-
Can CAG itself sack a minister?
No. CAG reports; PAC and the House politically enforce. Accountability is parliamentary, not a fourth-branch veto.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
Compare and contrast the British and Indian approaches to Parliamentary sovereignty. -
2023 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the structure of the Parliamentary Committee system. How far have the financial committees helped in the institutionalization of Indian Parliament? -
2022 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
Discuss the procedures to decide the disputes arising out of the election of a Member of the Parliament or State Legislature under The Representation of the People Act, 1951. What are the grounds on which the election of any returned candidate may be declared void? What remedy is available to the aggrieved party against the decision ? Refer to the case laws. -
2021 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Do Department -related Parliamentary Standing Committees keep the administration on its toes and inspire reverence for parliamentary control? Evaluate the working of such committees with suitable examples. -
2020 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
"Once a speaker, Always a speaker'! Do you think the practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India. -
2019 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
"Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is a limited power and it cannot be enlarged into absolute power." In the light of this statement explain whether Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power?(15). -
2019 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Individual Parliamentarian's role as the national lawmaker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.(15). -
2018 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
Why do you think the committees are considered to be useful for parliamentary work? Discuss, in this context, the role of the Estimates Committee.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS II · 10 marks
'Constitutional Morality' is rooted in the Constitution itself and is founded on its essential facets. Explain the doctrine of 'Constitutional Morality' with the help of relevant judicial decisions.
Indian Constitution
Constitutional morality is fidelity to liberty, equality, dignity and the rule of law in the Constitution itself. Kesavananda (1973) locked those essential facets as basic structure. Navtej Johar (2018) preferred constitutional morality over social morality on Section 377. Indian Young Lawyers Association (Sabarimala, 2018) tested temple exclusion against Articles 14, 15, 17 and 25. NCT of Delhi (2018) used the doctrine to restrain a parallel Lieutenant Governor against an elected government.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS II · 10 marks
Discuss the desirability of greater representation to women in the higher judiciary to ensure diversity, equity and inclusiveness.
Executive and Judiciary
Women remain under-represented on Supreme Court and High Court benches despite a large pool at the Bar. Diversity improves judging in gender, family and workplace cases; equity and inclusiveness are Articles 14–16 values the Court itself enforces. The filter is informal networks and seniority practice, not a constitutional ban. Publish data, widen the district-judge and senior-advocate pool, and name gender diversity as a collegium criterion. Inclusion is about legitimacy of the Bench, not about a single judicial ideology.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS II · 10 marks
How have the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission of India enabled the states to improve their fiscal position?
Governance and Policy
The 14th Finance Commission raised States’ share in the divisible pool from 32 to 42 per cent for 2015–20. Untied devolution, not only CSS, let States fund their own priorities and borrow on a more predictable base. Horizontal criteria helped poorer and forested States; revenue-deficit grants closed residual gaps. Local-body and disaster grants reduced raids on State revenue for third-tier and calamity costs. Cesses outside the pool and later GST shocks limited the gain; the 15th FC kept devolution near that high watermark at 41 per cent.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.