Revision summary
Committees give Parliament time, expertise and cross-party scrutiny that the floor cannot. DRSCs (1993) and the three financial committees cover Bills, estimates, accounts and PSUs. The Estimates Committee has 30 Lok Sabha members, no minister, and studies economy and presentation of Budget estimates. It does not audit spent money (PAC) or run public undertakings (COPU). It becomes useful when reports precede grants and Action Taken Notes are published.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
The floor of the Lok Sabha cannot audit every demand for grant or every clause of a technical Bill. Parliamentary committees take that work into a smaller, less partisan room, with papers, officers and time. The Estimates Committee is the House’s own tool for asking whether the Budget’s numbers are economical and well-formed, before and beside the Public Accounts Committee’s post-spend audit.
Body
Why committees help parliamentary work
- They save floor time: detailed clause work and demand-for-grant scrutiny move to Departmentally Related Standing Committees, created in 1993, so the House debates the political choice rather than every line item.
- They allow cross-party sitting; members speak as scrutineers rather than as a whipped majority, which is closer to the original Westminster committee idea.
- They call officials and papers that cannot be examined in a two-hour debate, and they produce reports that the government must answer through Action Taken Notes.
- Financial committees — Public Accounts Committee, Estimates Committee, and Committee on Public Undertakings — complete the Budget cycle: PAC after expenditure with the CAG, Estimates on the form and economy of estimates, COPU on public undertakings.
- Ad hoc select and joint committees handle contested Bills; the Standing Committee on Privileges and the Ethics Committee protect the House’s own standards.
- The Second Administrative Reforms Commission and successive Rules Committee notes have treated a strong committee system as the practical meaning of Article 105 deliberation, not as a rival to the House.
Role of the Estimates Committee
- The Estimates Committee of the Lok Sabha has thirty members, all from the Lok Sabha, elected each year; no minister sits on it, so executive membership cannot blunt the inquiry.
- It examines the estimates laid in the Budget, suggests economies, alternative policies, and the form in which estimates should be presented, and may continue examination even after the grants are voted.
- It does not examine public undertakings in the COPU sense, and it does not audit accounts after spending; that is the CAG–PAC track under Article 151 and the PAC’s convention of an Opposition chair.
- Unlike the PAC, the Estimates Committee is usually chaired from the ruling side; usefulness therefore depends on the quality of its reports, not on an automatic adversarial chair.
- It can pick a ministry or a scheme — for example defence capital, food subsidy, or a flagship mission — and ask whether staff, norms and outcomes match the rupee asked.
- Origin in India goes back to the 1921 Standing Financial Committee idea and to the 1950 reconstitution after the Constitution, modelled on the British Estimates Committee tradition.
Limits that a fair discussion must record
- It cannot vote the grant; the House still passes the Demands, so a sharp Estimates report can be ignored in the rush of the Budget session.
- It has limited research staff compared with the CAG’s audit teams, so it depends on ministry replies.
- It cannot impose a tax or rewrite a Money Bill; Article 110 and the Budget procedure remain with the government and the House.
Way forward
- Give the Estimates Committee a small budget-analysis cell, and fix a calendar so reports on large demands appear before the related DRSC sitting.
- Require a published Action Taken Report within a set time, as PAC practice already expects, so Estimates work does not end as an unread volume.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Lok Sabha floor] --> C[Committees] C --> E[Estimates Committee 30 LS] C --> P[PAC with CAG] C --> D[DRSCs 1993] E --> B[Economy and form of estimates]
Conclusion
Committees are useful because they supply time, papers and a less theatrical scrutiny that the floor cannot. The Estimates Committee, a thirty-member Lok Sabha body, examines whether Budget estimates are economical and well presented; it will matter more when its reports are timed to the grant and answered in public, not only tabled.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
'Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government's accountability to the people' Discuss.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q3). View answer →
-
Does the Estimates Committee include Rajya Sabha members?
No. All thirty members are from the Lok Sabha. PAC and COPU include members from both Houses.
-
Can the Estimates Committee stop a Demand for Grant?
No. Only the House votes the grant. The Committee recommends; the government may accept, delay or ignore, subject to political cost.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this topic
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 10 marks · Solution
Examine whether the constitutional office of the Lok Sabha Speaker has become vulnerable to partisan politics under the current anti-defection regime. What institutional changes are required to ensure the neutrality of the Lok Sabha Speaker in managing a polarised House?
Parliament and State Legislatures
• The Lok Sabha Speaker faces a conflict of interest because they remain in a political party while deciding disqualification cases under the Tenth Schedule. • Key vulnerabilities include dual political allegiance, weaponization of the anti-defection whip for government stability, and tactical delays in rulings. • The Supreme Court (*Keisham Meghachandra Singh*, 2020) criticized these delays and suggested moving to an independent tribunal. • Reform idea 1: Adopt the British convention where the Speaker cuts all party ties and runs unopposed in elections. • Reform idea 2: Shift defection adjudication entirely away from the Speaker to an outside body like the Election Commission. • Reform idea 3: Enforce strict statutory time limits to prevent politicians from stalling defection cases during crises.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS II · 10 marks · Solution
"Women as a class neither belong to a minority group nor are they regarded as forming a backward class." In the light of this statement, discuss the evolution of women's reservation from local bodies to Parliament.
Parliament and State Legislatures
• Women form a cross-cutting demographic, not a traditional minority or caste-based backward class.
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks · Solution
Indian Constitution has conferred the amending power on the ordinary legislative institutions with a few procedural hurdles. In view of this statement, examine the procedural and substantive limitations on the amending power of the Parliament to change the Constitution.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Article 368 uses Parliament’s Houses, not a standing constituent assembly, with special majority and no joint sitting. Federal provisions need ratification by at least half the States. Ordinary Acts cannot amend the Constitution. Kesavananda, Minerva Mills, Indira Gandhi and I.R. Coelho set substantive basic-structure limits, including judicial review and rights-DPSPs balance. NJAC 2015 shows the doctrine applying to institutional design, not only to rights texts.