Revision summary
Committees give Parliament time, expertise and cross-party scrutiny that the floor cannot. DRSCs (1993) and the three financial committees cover Bills, estimates, accounts and PSUs. The Estimates Committee has 30 Lok Sabha members, no minister, and studies economy and presentation of Budget estimates. It does not audit spent money (PAC) or run public undertakings (COPU). It becomes useful when reports precede grants and Action Taken Notes are published.
Model answer
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Lok Sabha floor] --> C[Committees] C --> E[Estimates Committee 30 LS] C --> P[PAC with CAG] C --> D[DRSCs 1993] E --> B[Economy and form of estimates]
Conclusion
- Give the Estimates Committee a small budget-analysis cell, and fix a calendar so reports on large demands appear before the related DRSC sitting.
- Require a published Action Taken Report within a set time, as PAC practice already expects, so Estimates work does not end as an unread volume.
Committees are useful because they supply time, papers and a less theatrical scrutiny that the floor cannot. The Estimates Committee, a thirty-member Lok Sabha body, examines whether Budget estimates are economical and well presented; it will matter more when its reports are timed to the grant and answered in public, not only tabled.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
'Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government's accountability to the people' Discuss.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q3). View answer →
-
Does the Estimates Committee include Rajya Sabha members?
No. All thirty members are from the Lok Sabha. PAC and COPU include members from both Houses.
-
Can the Estimates Committee stop a Demand for Grant?
No. Only the House votes the grant. The Committee recommends; the government may accept, delay or ignore, subject to political cost.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
To what extent, in your view, the Parliament is able to ensure accountability of the executive in India? -
2021 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Do Department -related Parliamentary Standing Committees keep the administration on its toes and inspire reverence for parliamentary control? Evaluate the working of such committees with suitable examples. -
2020 · Q5 · GS II · 10 marks
"Once a speaker, Always a speaker'! Do you think the practice should be adopted to impart objectivity to the office of the Speaker of Lok Sabha? What could be its implications for the robust functioning of parliamentary business in India. -
2019 · Q12 · GS II · 15 marks
"Parliament's power to amend the Constitution is a limited power and it cannot be enlarged into absolute power." In the light of this statement explain whether Parliament under Article 368 of the Constitution can destroy the Basic Structure of the Constitution by expanding its amending power?(15). -
2019 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Individual Parliamentarian's role as the national lawmaker is on a decline, which in turn, has adversely impacted the quality of debates and their outcome. Discuss.(15). -
2017 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
'Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government's accountability to the people' Discuss. -
2017 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
The Indian Constitution has provisions for holding joint session of the two houses of the Parliament. Enumerate the occasions when this would normally happen and also the occasions when it cannot, with reasons thereof. (250 words). -
2015 · Q15 · GS II · 12 marks
If amendment bill to the Whistleblowers Protection Act 2011 tabled in the Parliament is passed, there maybe no on left to protect. Critically Evaluate.
More from this topic
Q12 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
Indian Constitution has conferred the amending power on the ordinary legislative institutions with a few procedural hurdles. In view of this statement, examine the procedural and substantive limitations on the amending power of the Parliament to change the Constitution.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Article 368 uses Parliament’s Houses, not a standing constituent assembly, with special majority and no joint sitting. Federal provisions need ratification by at least half the States. Ordinary Acts cannot amend the Constitution. Kesavananda, Minerva Mills, Indira Gandhi and I.R. Coelho set substantive basic-structure limits, including judicial review and rights-DPSPs balance. NJAC 2015 shows the doctrine applying to institutional design, not only to rights texts.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
"The growth of cabinet system has practkally resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy." Elucidate.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Articles 74–75 keep the Cabinet responsible to the Lok Sabha; that is the legal core of parliamentary government. Whips and the Tenth Schedule, ordinances and money-bill classification have moved real initiation to the Cabinet. This is practical marginalisation of the floor, not a legal repeal of Parliament. PAC, standing committees, Rajya Sabha and the floor test still bite. Keisham Meghachandra pressed Speakers to decide disqualification on a clock. A narrower anti-defection law would restore some of the supremacy the quote says is lost. The examiner’s misspelling does not change the demand: show practice squeezing text, not text dying.
Q16 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS II · 15 marks
Explain the structure of the Parliamentary Committee system. How far have the financial committees helped in the institutionalization of Indian Parliament?
Parliament and State Legislatures
Parliamentary committees are standing, financial, administrative and ad hoc. DRSCs since 1993 examine grants, bills and ministry policy with both Houses. PAC, Estimates Committee and COPU are the three financial committees. PAC works on CAG reports and is conventionally chaired by the Opposition. They institutionalise continuous financial scrutiny, not a veto on Supply. Weak follow-up of recommendations is the main limit on that institutionalisation.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.