Revision summary
Global brands and platforms can flatten language and craft. Internal politics and caste also threaten pluralism. GI tags, regional OTT, and diaspora archives use global pipes to save difference. Hybrid culture is a new pluralism, not only a loss. Stand: partial threat from globalisation, not a single-cause collapse.
Model answer
Introduction
Globalisation moves goods, media, and migrants. It can flatten taste into English, mall, and platform. It can also fund GI crafts, regional cinema, and diaspora pride. Diversity in India is under pressure from many forces; globalisation is one, not the only, and not only a wrecking ball.
Body
Threat pathways
- Cultural homogenisation: global brands, English-medium aspiration, and algorithm feeds can shrink local tongues and foodways, especially among urban youth.
- Market concentration: small weavers, wet-market fish, and neighbourhood cinema lose to chains and OTT catalogues that privilege scale.
- Aspirational sameness can make pluralism look rustic, which is a soft threat to everyday diversity.
- Global Islamist or Hindutva media circuits, which are also transnational, can harden identities and reduce lived pluralism even when the ‘global’ is not Hollywood.
Why globalisation is not the sole threat
- Majoritarian politics, communal riot memory, and caste exclusion threaten pluralism with or without WTO.
- Official language hierarchy and internal migration stress predate 1991 liberalisation.
- Blaming only ‘the West’ misses Indian capital and Indian platforms as globalisers.
Counter-currents that justify a nuanced no
- Regional cinema, OTT in Tamil, Malayalam, and Bhojpuri, and GI tags (Darjeeling, Kanjeevaram, Alphonso) use the world market to keep difference alive.
- Diaspora money and digital archives revive scripts, recipes, and festivals.
- Constitutional pluralism (Articles 25–30, Eighth Schedule) is a domestic legal resource that global human-rights talk sometimes supports.
- Hybridity — Indo-Chinese plates, IPL, fusion music — is a new diversity, not always a death of the old.
Justify the stand
- Partial threat: yes, for vulnerable languages, crafts, and attention.
- Total threat: no. Pluralism’s sharper present danger is often political homogenisation at home.
- Policy: protect language in schools, enforce GI and fair trade, keep platform diversity rules, and refuse to treat globalisation as fate.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Globalisation] --> H[Homogenising market] G --> R[GI OTT diaspora revival] P[Domestic majoritarianism] --> T[Threat to pluralism] H --> T R --> D[Living diversity]
Conclusion
Globalisation threatens some layers of Indian diversity through market sameness. It also carries regional culture farther than the district ever could. Justify a qualified yes on crafts and tongues, and a no to the claim that pluralism’s only enemy is the global.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Customs and traditions suppress reason leading to obscurantism. Do you agree?
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q19). View answer →
-
Does eating pizza end Indian diversity?
No. Diversity dies when schools, laws, and markets allow only one public culture, not when menus add a plate.
-
Is anti-globalisation the pluralist policy?
Smart pluralism uses global markets for GI and film while protecting language and small producers at home.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q20 · GS I · 15 marks
Elucidate the relationship between globalization and new technology in a world of scarce resources, with special reference to India. -
2018 · Q19 · GS I · 15 marks
'Globalisation is generally said to promote cultural homogenisation but due to this cultural specificities appear to be strengthened in the Indian society.' Elucidate. -
2016 · Q8 · GS I · 12 marks
To what extent globalisation has influenced the core of cultural diversity in India? Explain.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks
The rock-cut architecture represents one of the most important sources of our knowledge of early Indian art and history. Discuss.
Indian Heritage and Culture
Rock-cut work survives as dated sculpture, painting, and inscription. Ajanta keeps Vakataka murals and Buddhist narrative. Ellora shows Buddhist, Hindu, and Jain patronage on one hill, including Kailasa. Mahabalipuram records Pallava rathas and the turn to structural temples. The caves are a core source, though they under-represent ordinary life.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks
Pala period is the most significant phase in the history of Buddhism in India. Enumerate.
Indian Heritage and Culture
Pala kings endowed Nalanda and raised Vikramshila and related mahaviharas. The phase matured Mahayana and Vajrayana when much of India had other royal cults. Pala bronze and manuscript painting set an eastern Buddhist style. Atisha carried this learning into Tibet. It is the last organised Indian Buddhist university age.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks
Evaluate the policies of Lord Curzon and their long term implications on the national movements.
The Freedom Struggle
Curzon pursued efficient empire: frontier, municipal control, and universities. The 1904 Universities Act tightened official grip on campuses. The 1905 Partition of Bengal triggered Swadeshi, boycott, and Extremist politics. Reunion in 1911 did not erase communal and revolutionary afterlives. Long term, Curzon expanded the national movement more than he pacified it.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.