Revision summary
Language and identity pride have produced states and regional parties. Sons-of-the-soil politics uses culture to gate jobs and migration. Telangana and fiscal federalism show economic regionalism beside culture. The 1956 linguistic map was cultural state-making with an administrative aim. Agree in part: culture is a cause, not the only consequence-engine.
Model answer
Introduction
Regionalism in India is the claim of a language, a homeland, or a state against a centre or a neighbour. Cultural assertiveness is part of it. It is not the whole cause. Economy, federal power, and migration also make regions.
Body
Where culture does drive regionalism
- Language movements — Telugu, Tamil, and later identity politics of script and school — were cultural assertiveness that became states and parties.
- Sons-of-the-soil campaigns mix pride of culture with jobs: Shiv Sena’s Bombay, or nativist turns in Assam’s language and citizenship debates.
- Festival, film, and caste-region pride can harden a ‘we’ against Hindi or against a migrant ‘they’.
Why the thesis is incomplete
- Regionalism also follows uneven development: Telangana’s complaint was irrigation and jobs as much as culture.
- Federal design — States Reorganisation, Article 370’s old speciality, Sixth Schedule, and GST bargaining — creates regional politics even without a new cultural wave.
- Sometimes culture is the idiom of a class or tribal material fight, not the independent cause.
Argue a balanced yes-but
- Agree that rising cultural assertiveness, in language and identity media, has fed many regional parties since the 1980s.
- Disagree that it ‘appears to be’ the consequence as a single arrow. Older regionalism of 1956 was linguistic state-making; newer regionalism is also fiscal and urban-job nativism.
- Best argument: culture supplies the banner; political economy supplies much of the fuel.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CA[Cultural assertiveness] --> R[Regionalism] E[Uneven development] --> R F[Federal power jobs] --> R
Conclusion
Cultural assertiveness is a real and rising source of Indian regionalism. It is not a sufficient explanation. Argue for a both-and: language and pride, plus development and federal power.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What are the challenges to our cultural practices in the name of secularism?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q10). View answer →
-
Is regionalism anti-national?
Indian federalism expected regions. Secession is a different claim from a state party demanding a fair share.
-
Has cultural assertiveness only increased?
Media and identity politics have amplified it. Economic shocks still create regionalism without a new dance form.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q18 · GS I · 15 marks
Analyze the salience of 'sect' in Indian society vis-a-vis caste, region and religion. -
2022 · Q19 · GS I · 15 marks
Are tolerance, assimilation and pluralism the key elements in the making of an Indian form of secularism? Justify your answer. -
2020 · Q8 · GS I · 10 marks
Has caste lost its relevance in understanding the multi- cultural Indian Society? Elaborate your answer with illustrations. -
2019 · Q10 · GS I · 10 marks
What are the challenges to our cultural practices in the name of secularism? -
2018 · Q8 · GS I · 10 marks
"Caste system is assuming new identities and associational forms. Hence, caste system cannot be eradicated in India." Comment. -
2018 · Q10 · GS I · 10 marks
How the Indian concept of secularism different from the western model of secularism? Discuss. -
2018 · Q20 · GS I · 15 marks
'Communalism arises either due to power struggle or relative deprivation.' Argue by giving suitable illustrations. -
2017 · Q19 · GS I · 15 marks
Distinguish between religiousness/religiosity and communalism giving one example of how the former has got transformed into the latter in independent India. (250 words).
More from this topic
Q9 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS I · 10 marks
Intercaste marriages between castes which have socio-economic parity have increased, to some extent, but this is less true of interreligious marriages. Discuss.
Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism
Intercaste marriage has increased a little where education, income and urban life already match. The Hindu Marriage Act does not bar intercaste unions. The Special Marriage Act offers a civil path. The rise is selective and still a minority practice. Caste violence has not vanished. Interreligious marriage is rarer because personal law, conversion fears and honour politics raise the cost. Class can sometimes buy a caste exception. It rarely buys a religious exception in today’s climate. Constitutional choice of partner exists. Social enforcement is still family and community.
Q20 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS I · 15 marks
Discuss the impact of post-liberal economy on ethnic identity and communalism.
Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism
After 1991, markets, private jobs, and mass media grew together. Ethnic claims for language, tribe, and new states continued inside that growth. Communal mobilisation used television, rumour, and later social media. Riots and polarising politics showed that GDP does not cancel religious conflict. The market can mix people at work and still sell identity at home and at the vote.
Q19 · UPSC Mains 2023 · GS I · 15 marks
Why is caste identity in India both fluid and static?
Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism
Sanskritization, migration, and quota politics make caste claims move. Endogamy, atrocities, and caste associations keep rank sticky. The office can be fluid while the wedding remains static. Law bans untouchability; practice often does not. Both words in the question are therefore right at the same time.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.