Q8 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2018 · GS I · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q10 Q10 →

"Caste system is assuming new identities and associational forms. Hence, caste system cannot be eradicated in India." Comment.

Topic: Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism. Syllabus: Social empowerment, communalism, regionalism and secularism. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism.

Revision summary

Caste now lives in associations, parties, certificates, and diaspora marriage, not only in village occupation. Mandal-era politics and reservation lists give caste a modern public face. New forms show adaptation, not that caste is immortal. Law against untouchability and social mixing have already reduced some hierarchy. The fair comment is to fight disability and atrocity while identities slowly thin.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Caste in India has not stayed only as a village hierarchy of occupation and marriage. It now appears as a surname in a city, a vote bank, a welfare category, and an association. New forms prove change, not that caste can never be reduced.

Body

New identities and associations

  • Urban jobs and education weaken the old link of caste and hereditary craft, yet endogamy, surnames, and food rules still mark many households.
  • Caste sabhas, student unions, and professional networks of a jati work as modern associations for scholarships, weddings, and jobs.
  • Politics turned caste into a mobilisation tool after Mandal, with parties and federations speaking for OBCs, Dalits, and dominant peasant castes in the states.
  • Reservation, certificates, and census-style lists freeze a bureaucratic identity even as the person works in an IT park far from the ancestral village.
  • Diaspora temples and matrimonial sites carry jati abroad, so the map of caste is no longer only rural India.

Does this mean caste cannot be eradicated?

  • The statement is too strong. Untouchability is already a crime under Article 17 and the PoA Act; temple entry, inter-caste marriage, and Dalit assertion show that hierarchy can be pushed back.
  • Sanskritisation, conversion, and class mobility mix identities; a chamar leather worker and a Dalit IAS officer do not live the same caste.
  • What grows is often caste as interest group, not the full varna order of purity and pollution in every street.
  • Eradication of all caste feeling is a long social project; eradication of legal disability and of atrocity is a nearer constitutional duty.

Way forward

  • Keep law against atrocity and discrimination, widen education and mixed housing, and do not treat a vote bank as destiny.
  • Distinguish caste as a surviving identity from caste as an unchangeable system; the first can shrink while the second is already cracked.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Caste] --> V[Village endogamy]
  C --> A[Sabhas parties certificates]
  A --> N[New identity]
  L[Article 17 education mixing] --> E[Hierarchy can shrink]
  N --> Q[Not the same as eternal system]

Conclusion

Caste has taken new associational and political forms, so it has not vanished. That is not proof that it cannot be eroded; law, mixing, and equality still work against hierarchy even when surnames remain.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • How the Indian concept of secularism different from the western model of secularism? Discuss.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q10). View answer →

  • Has urbanisation ended caste?

    It has loosened occupation and some daily rules. Marriage, politics, and atrocity show that caste still operates in new clothes.

  • Does reservation keep caste alive?

    It records a category to repair historic exclusion. It does not by itself create the village hierarchy; ending reservation without equality would not erase caste.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2015 · Q19 · GS I · 12 marks

    Smart cities in India cannot sustain without smart villages. Discuss this statement in the backdrop of rural urban integration.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q10 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS I · 10 marks · Solution

Do you think digital technology promotes social empowerment? Explain with examples.

Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism

Digital technology acts as a double-edged sword for social empowerment, bridging gaps in marginalized communities while simultaneously creating new forms of exclusion. On one hand, e-governance, financial inclusion via Jan Dhan, and digital literacy schemes enable grassroots mobility and amplify subaltern voices. On the other hand, the digital divide, algorithmic bias, and cyber-exclusion exacerbate existing socio-economic hierarchies. Therefore, structural interventions alongside technological deployment are necessary to ensure inclusive empowerment.

Q8 · UPSC Mains 2026 · GS I · 10 marks · Solution

Unity in diversity remains the defining feature of Indian society despite the challenges from communalism and regionalism. Comment.

Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism

India's civilizational ethos of unity in diversity persists despite structural pressures from communalism and regionalism. The answer analyses how historical syncretism and constitutional pluralism absorb societal friction. Communal polarization threatens the secular fabric through identity politics and majoritarianism. Regional aspirations, while occasionally manifesting as divisive sub-nationalism, often reflect genuine developmental imbalances. The conclusion highlights constitutionalism and inclusive governance as the anchors for reinforcing national cohesion.

Q9 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS I · 10 marks · Solution

Intercaste marriages between castes which have socio-economic parity have increased, to some extent, but this is less true of interreligious marriages. Discuss.

Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism

Intercaste marriage has increased a little where education, income and urban life already match. The Hindu Marriage Act does not bar intercaste unions. The Special Marriage Act offers a civil path. The rise is selective and still a minority practice. Caste violence has not vanished. Interreligious marriage is rarer because personal law, conversion fears and honour politics raise the cost. Class can sometimes buy a caste exception. It rarely buys a religious exception in today’s climate. Constitutional choice of partner exists. Social enforcement is still family and community.

PDF