Revision summary
Constitutional equality was not enough against tribal atrocity and forest eviction. The 1989 PoA Act creates special offences and forums against violence and humiliation of STs. The 2006 FRA recognises individual and community forest rights through the gram sabha. One law targets interpersonal caste-patterned crime; the other targets State and forest exclusion. Fifth Schedule and PESA support self-rule but the two headline initiatives remain PoA and FRA.
Model answer
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[ST discrimination] --> V[Atrocity humiliation] D --> L[Forest land denial] V --> P[PoA Act 1989] L --> F[FRA 2006] P --> R[Legal protection] F --> R
Conclusion
- Name the two Acts clearly, then add Fifth Schedule, PCR Act 1955, and PESA only as supporting architecture.
- Stress land, forest, and bodily dignity as the three sites of tribal discrimination these laws try to reach.
Since Independence the State’s two major legal answers to ST discrimination are the 1989 Atrocities Act against violence and humiliation, and the 2006 Forest Rights Act against eviction from forest land and livelihood. Rights on paper still need courts and gram sabhas if discrimination is not to continue in fact.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Has the formation of linguistic states strengthened the cause of Indian unity?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q6). View answer →
-
Is reservation one of the two initiatives asked here?
Reservation is a major constitutional tool. This 10-mark legal-initiatives question is standardly answered with the 1989 Atrocities Act and the 2006 Forest Rights Act.
-
Why not only the Fifth Schedule?
The Fifth Schedule is foundational but older and administrative. FRA and PoA are the two concrete post-Independence statutes that target atrocity and forest-land discrimination most directly.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q3 · GS I · 10 marks
Assess the main administrative issues and socio-cultural problems in the integration process of Indian Princely States. -
2016 · Q6 · GS I · 12 marks
Has the formation of linguistic states strengthened the cause of Indian unity?
More from this topic
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · GS I · 10 marks
Assess the main administrative issues and socio-cultural problems in the integration process of Indian Princely States.
Post-independence Consolidation
Lapse of paramountcy created a sovereignty vacuum that Patel and Menon filled by accession. Tiny states had to be merged into viable unions before 1956 reorganisation. Privy purses and court services delayed a uniform administration. Hyderabad, Junagadh, and Kashmir mixed communal demography with force and diplomacy. Praja mandals wanted democracy, not only a change of suzerain.
Q6 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS I · 12 marks
Has the formation of linguistic states strengthened the cause of Indian unity?
Post-independence Consolidation
Andhra 1953 and the 1956 Act made language the main basis of the state map. Mother-tongue government reduced the sense of internal colonialism in the south and elsewhere. Regional parties mostly chose to rule states rather than leave India. Border, river, and nativist conflicts continue and need minority and Centre–state tools. On balance, linguistic states have been a method of unity, not a rehearsal for partition.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.