Revision summary
Lodhas of south-west Bengal were notified under the Criminal Tribes Act and later denotified, remaining a PVTG. P. K. Bhowmick’s ethnography showed crime statistics as a product of land and forest loss plus police labelling. He combined research with cooperatives, education and state advocacy. Decriminalisation is legal repeal plus social destigmatisation; the second is unfinished. He stands in the Indian tradition that refused racial criminal types.
Model answer
Introduction
P. K. Bhowmick of Calcutta University spent decades with the Lodha (also Lodha-Savara) of western Bengal’s jungle mahals. He showed that their “criminality” was a colonial label, not a racial trait, and he worked to dismantle that status in law and in the village.
Body
Criminalisation
The Criminal Tribes Act, 1871 (amended 1911, 1924) notified communities as hereditary criminals, with roll-call, restricted movement and police stigma. Lodhas of Midnapore–Jhargram, forest-edge people with hunting, gathering and later wage work, were so notified. After Independence the Act was repealed (1952) and groups became Denotified Tribes (DNTs). Stigma, police suspicion and poverty continued. Lodhas are listed as PVTG in West Bengal — vulnerability after criminalisation, not a primitive essence.
Bhowmick’s contribution
Bhowmick’s ethnography (The Lodhas of West Bengal and later papers) reconstructed Lodha economy, kinship and the history of notification. He argued that theft and dacoity statistics were produced by land loss, forest closure and police expectation, a labelling loop. He combined participant fieldwork with applied anthropology: cooperatives, education, settlement, and representation to the state. He helped make the Lodha a subject of welfare anthropology rather than of the thana.
- Decriminalising status meant: (1) insisting legally that Lodhas are citizens and a Scheduled Tribe/PVTG, not a crime caste; (2) changing police and neighbour practice; (3) building livelihood alternatives so that survival did not confirm the stereotype. Bhowmick’s students and the Lodha development literature in Bengal follow that programme.
Limits
Denotification did not end encounter killings, bonded work or school dropout. Xaxa’s wider DNT point applies: without land and dignity, a repealed Act still lives in the file. Bhowmick did not “save” a people by himself; he reframed them for the university and the secretariat. That reframing is the anthropological contribution: from criminal tribe to dispossessed forest people.
Place him with S. C. Roy (who humanised Mundas) and against Risley’s typed criminality. Ghurye’s assimilation is not Bhowmick’s path; Bhowmick sought specific rehabilitation, closer to Elwin’s protection without isolation as romance.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CTA[Criminal Tribes Act] --> L[Lodha stigma] B[Bhowmick fieldwork] --> R[DNT PVTG welfare] R --> I[Incomplete dignity]
Conclusion
- Bhowmick decriminalised the Lodha in knowledge and in advocacy: he replaced a hereditary crime type with a history of forest dispossession and a PVTG welfare claim. Law had already repealed the Criminal Tribes Act; he worked on the stigma that survived the repeal.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine existing paradigms of holistic health for the marginalized sections of society drawing inferences from COVID-19 pandemic.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Did Bhowmick repeal the Criminal Tribes Act?
No. Parliament repealed it in 1952. Bhowmick fought the ethnographic and police afterlife of the label among Lodhas.
-
Are Lodhas still called a criminal tribe in law?
No. The legal category is gone. Social stigma and PVTG poverty are the remaining facts.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Digitisation of rural economy -
2024 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Origin of State Societies -
2024 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Syro-Malabar Christians -
2024 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Artisan tribes of Jharkhand -
2024 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Causes of stunting and wasting among tribal children. -
2024 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
How is PESA Act empowering local self-governance and impacting women's political participation? -
2024 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically describe evidences from Rakhi Garhi and its linkages to Harappan civilization. -
2024 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
B.K. Roy Burman's concept of 'Buffer Zone'
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Trace the history and describe the methods of formulating the lists of OBCs, both at the State and National levels
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Kalelkar listed; Mandal implemented 27 percent with social-educational-economic tests. Indra Sawhney added creamy layer and a 50 percent ceiling. 102nd Amendment constitutionalised NCBC; 105th restored state lists after the Maratha judgment. Rohini tries to sub-categorise Central OBCs; Ram Singh required data for Jat inclusion. Centre and states maintain separate lists; method is gazette politics under judicial review.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"The village was not merely a place where people lived; it had a design in which were reflected the basic values of Indian civilization." Who said this? Elaborate
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
The statement is from the Srinivas village-studies tradition: the village as a designed microcosm of Indian civilisation. Design includes caste ecology, agrarian rank, ritual calendar and factional politics. Values: hierarchy-with-interdependence, local dharma, jati marriage, sacred geography. Marriott, Dube and Bailey showed regional versions of the same idea. Land reform, migration, 73rd Amendment and PESA have rewritten the plan without erasing rank.
Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Lothal dockyard and international trade relations.
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
S. R. Rao identified a burnt-brick tidal basin at Lothal as a dock beside warehouses and bead workshops. Gujarat Harappan coastal sites together support craft export to the Gulf and Mesopotamia (Meluhha). Some archaeologists prefer a reservoir reading; geomorphology of the estuary is still discussed. Even without the word dock, Lothal is a water-edge trade and craft town. International trade here is Bronze Age Gulf networks, not a modern port trust.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.