Revision summary
Tribals have managed forests and uplands but Forest Acts and industry stripped title, leaving deprivation beside custody. Climate change will thin wild food, disturb jhum and wet-rice water, raise coastal and mountain risk, and worsen health. Carbon and fortress conservation can evict as 1878 did. FRA, PESA, PVTG habitat rights and Gram Sabha consent are the survival toolkit. Custody must include livelihood, not a duty to remain poor.
Model answer
Introduction
Tribal communities have long managed forests, hills, coasts and uplands that the rest of India now calls natural resources. They remain among the most land-poor, nutritionally insecure and politically thin groups. Climate change will widen that gap unless rights, not only relief, organise the response.
Body
Custodians who do not own
L. P. Vidyarthi’s nature–man–spirit complex and Elwin’s aboriginal ecology described care of grove, river and jhum cycle. Roy Burman’s buffer zone tried to keep that care spatially intact. Yet Forest Acts 1878 and 1927, mines, dams and parks took title. The custodian became an encroacher. FRA 2006 and PESA are attempts to realign law with that older custody. Deprivation is therefore political, not a failure of tribal intelligence.
How climate change will hit survival
Forests and jhum. Hotter, drier or more erratic monsoon years shorten fallow, raise fire, and collapse millet and sal-seed calendars. PVTGs who still forage (Birhor, some Andaman groups, hill Kharia) face thinner wild food — the same path already seen in stunting notes.
Water and mountains. Himalayan and North-Eastern tribes meet glacial and cloudburst risk, slope failure, and dying springs. Apatani channels and other wet-rice systems need stable stream timing. Central Indian plateau tribes meet drought and falling groundwater beside coal pits that already heat and dust the belt.
Coasts and islands. Nicobarese, coastal fishing Scheduled Tribes, and Sundarban-adjacent groups face sea-level rise and cyclone intensity. Andaman policy must treat climate as a contact and food problem, not a tourism opportunity.
Health. Malaria belts may shift; heat kills outdoor labour; nutrition fails when PDS rice meets a failed forest snack economy. COVID-19 already showed that distant PHCs and migrant return crush tribal households. Climate is another such shock, slower and then sudden.
Livelihood. Distress migration will increase. Women who gather MFP lose cash when phenology shifts. Carbon forestry and fortress net-zero projects can repeat 1878: new reserved carbon, old eviction. Xaxa warned against development without consent; climate projects need the same warning.
Critical examination
Tribals are not automatically “closest to nature” in a way that saves them. Landless labourers in a mined block are as exposed as anyone, with less savings. Some tribal elites capture compensation. The paradox is structural: those who stored carbon in standing forest were not paid; those who emit are insured. Survival in future depends on community forest titles, habitat rights for PVTGs, Gram Sabha veto on diversion, public health in hamlets, and climate finance that pays keepers rather than contractors. ILO 169’s consultation standard, which India has not ratified, is the global name for that veto. Domestic FRA is the available tool.
Do not preach that tribals should stay poor to keep the forest. Custody with secure livelihood is the anthropological demand.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD C[Climate shock] --> F[Forest water coast] F --> S[Food health migration] D[No title] --> S R[FRA PESA habitat] --> P[Survival with custody]
Conclusion
Climate change will strike tribal survival through forest food, water, coasts, heat and health, on top of an older dispossession. Custodianship without title is charity geography. Rights under FRA and PESA, and a refusal of green eviction, are the conditions of future survival.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Elucidate the difference between secularism, religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and spiritualism from an anthropological perspective.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Will climate change affect all tribals the same way?
No. Island, Himalayan, plateau drought and coastal groups face different hazards. Landless labourers inside a tribe are more exposed than titled cultivators.
-
Is a tiger reserve a climate solution for tribals?
Only if rights and MFP remain. A reserve that evicts the custodian copies colonial forestry in a green vocabulary.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of NGOs in the socioeconomic and political development of weaker sections and the manner in which they facilitate other stakeholders -
2025 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Identify the contemporary limitations in the process of tribal development. How can anthropological knowledge contribute in this process? -
2025 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the concept of Nation-State and describe its impact on indigenous societies -
2024 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Distinguish a 'Theocratic State' from a secular, liberal, democratic state. Illustrate your answer with examples from tribal and contemporary societies. -
2023 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the impact of modern democratic institutions on contemporary tribal societies. Illustrate with suitable ethnographic examples. -
2021 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Urbanization and tribal institutions -
2021 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of successive Land Acquisition Acts on tribal social organization -
2016 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe how various tribal development programmes and plans have impacted the process of social transformation among tribes
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Digitisation of rural economy
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Digitisation of the rural economy means electronic payments, identity, credit, markets and welfare records in the village. Jan Dhan, Aadhaar, UPI, e-NAM and computerised land records are the main instruments. Village power now includes control of phones, OTPs and Common Service Centres. Women, elderly people and many tribal hamlets remain excluded where biometrics and language fail. Without PESA and secure titles, digital records can lock in older dispossession.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Origin of State Societies
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
State societies have central offices, territory and surplus extraction beyond kinship. Service and Fried staged the move from tribe and chiefdom to state; Childe linked it to urban surplus. Carneiro stressed warfare and circumscription; hydraulic theories over-fit India. Rakhigarhi and other Harappan cities show urban organisation; Magadha shows a clearer early state. Hill and forest polities in India often remained chiefly or acephalous until colonial mapping.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Syro-Malabar Christians
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Syro-Malabar Christians are Kerala’s East Syriac Catholic community, in communion with Rome. Origin memory is the Thomas tradition; the rite was Latinised after Diamper and later restored. They are socially distinct from Malankara, Orthodox, Latin and Protestant Christians. Endogamy, land and literacy produced a caste-like rank inside Kerala Christianity. They are an Indian social system using a West-Asian liturgical language, not a foreign enclave.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.