Revision summary
Urbanization sends tribal workers to mines and towns. Clan marriage often continues at a distance. Village council and sacred grove lose everyday force. Urban hostels, churches, and ST associations replace some functions. Tribe becomes a city identity as well as a village order.
Model answer
Introduction
Urbanization pulls tribal households into towns, mines, and city margins. Tribal institutions—clan, council, grove, and bridewealth—do not vanish, but they are stretched and sometimes replaced.
Body
What moves
- Wage work in Ranchi, Bhilai, Surat, and North-East hill towns relocates young adults while elders stay on the land.
- Clan exogamy and tribe endogamy continue through phone and return marriage, so kinship outlives the village street.
- S. C. Roy’s village council and Vidyarthi’s nature-man-spirit complex lose daily grip when the grove is far and the landlord is a contractor.
What appears
- Tribal associations, churches, and ST hostels become urban institutions, a parallel to caste sabhas.
- PESA and traditional councils weaken where the voter now lives in a municipal ward.
- Slum and peri-urban settlements mix several tribes, which dilutes a single parha but creates a pan-Adivasi politics.
Limit
- Urbanization is uneven. Many ST households remain rural. The note is about institutional strain, not about the end of tribe.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD U[Urban jobs] --> K[Kinship at a distance] U --> C[Council grove thin] U --> A[Association church hostel]
Conclusion
Urbanization relocates tribal people faster than it deletes kinship. Councils and groves thin; associations, churches, and ST politics thicken in town.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the impact of successive Land Acquisition Acts on tribal social organization
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Does the city abolish tribal custom?
It relocates and thins it. Marriage rules often survive longer than grove ritual.
-
Are urban STs still a tribe in law?
ST status follows the presidential list and state rules, not the grove. Practice and certificate can diverge.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of NGOs in the socioeconomic and political development of weaker sections and the manner in which they facilitate other stakeholders -
2025 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Identify the contemporary limitations in the process of tribal development. How can anthropological knowledge contribute in this process? -
2025 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the concept of Nation-State and describe its impact on indigenous societies -
2024 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Custodians of natural resources are the tribals, but they are the most deprived. Critically examine how climate change will impact their survival in future. -
2024 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Distinguish a 'Theocratic State' from a secular, liberal, democratic state. Illustrate your answer with examples from tribal and contemporary societies. -
2023 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the impact of modern democratic institutions on contemporary tribal societies. Illustrate with suitable ethnographic examples. -
2021 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of successive Land Acquisition Acts on tribal social organization -
2016 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe how various tribal development programmes and plans have impacted the process of social transformation among tribes
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the concept of Nation-State and describe its impact on indigenous societies
Social change and contemporary tribal societies
Nation-state: one people, territory, law and citizenship; indigenous life is clan, grove and seasonal land. India is a Union with asymmetric clauses, not a pure nation-state, but still centralising in school, army and mine. Impacts: borders, legal monopoly, standard language, development-security, market. FRA, PESA, 371 and Sixth Schedule are domestic tools of coexistence. India has not ratified ILO 169; consultation remains the unkept promise.
Q7(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Identify the contemporary limitations in the process of tribal development. How can anthropological knowledge contribute in this process?
Social change and contemporary tribal societies
Limits: consent deficit, list-area mismatch, livelihood substitution, last-mile services, security overlay, elite capture, blunt data. Xaxa, PESA, FRA and Niyamgiri name the same gap between paper and hamlet. Anthropology contributes field method, ethnoecology, medical and linguistic knowledge, gendered land. Use it in FRA mapping and social impact before clearance, not as decoration in an EIA. PM-JANMAN helps only if PVTG hamlets author the micro-plan.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of NGOs in the socioeconomic and political development of weaker sections and the manner in which they facilitate other stakeholders
Social change and contemporary tribal societies
NGOs run last-mile services and translate FRA, PESA, scholarships and health camps for ST, SC and minorities. Politically they support Gram Sabha, RTI and PIL; Niyamgiri-type cases show them beside, not above, the village. They broker schemes, banks and CSR. Risks: donor capture, FCRA chill, elite contractors, substitution of the state. Xaxa’s measure is whether the hamlet still decides.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.