Revision summary
Karma is moral causation; rebirth is continuation in samsara. Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain systems share the pair with different views of the self. Socially the pair has justified caste and also supported ahimsa and pilgrimage merit. Ambedkar rejected karmic theodicy as a defence of inequality. Tribal funerary practice may take Hindu karmic words without dropping clan ancestors.
Model answer
Introduction
Karma is the moral law of action and consequence. Rebirth is the continuation of the person or subtle self in another life. Together they form a civilisational ethic in Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain thought, with different metaphysics but a shared social force.
Body
Doctrine
- In Brahmanical thought, karma binds the soul (atman) to samsara until knowledge or devotion releases it.
- Buddhism denies a permanent atman but keeps karmic continuity of the stream of becoming. The eightfold path aims at stopping rebirth.
- Jainism treats karma as a kind of matter that sticks to the jiva; release needs extreme restraint.
- Purushartha places moksha as the aim that ends the cycle; grihastha still acts, but with dharma.
Social effects
- Caste rank has been justified as fruit of past karma. Ambedkar attacked this as a theodicy of inequality.
- The same ethic also supports ahimsa, gift, and restraint, which Dumont read as a world-renouncing value inside caste society.
- Bhakti and some tantric lines offer grace that softens a strict karma ledger.
- Among tribes, N. K. Bose and S. C. Roy recorded Hindu karmic language entering Oraon and Munda funerary talk, while clan ancestors and sarna groves remained.
Anthropological point
- Karma and rebirth are Great Tradition ideas that parochialise into village fate, witchcraft accusation, and merit-making at pilgrimage sites (Vidyarthi’s Gaya).
Flow diagram
flowchart TD K[Karma] --> S[Samsara rebirth] S --> M[Moksha or nirvana] K --> C[Caste theodicy] A[Ambedkar] --> C
Conclusion
Karma and rebirth explain suffering and rank, and they organise ethics of ahimsa and gift. They can freeze caste as deserved, which Ambedkar rejected. Living India mixes them with bhakti, law, and tribal ancestor rites.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is annihilation of caste possible? Discuss the future of caste system in the light of various proactive measures taken by the Indian State.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Do all Indians believe in rebirth equally?
No. Intensity varies by sect, education, and religion. Many Muslims and Christians in India do not hold Hindu-Buddhist rebirth, yet live beside those who do.
-
Does karma make social reform impossible?
As theodicy it can delay reform. Bhakti, law, and Ambedkarite conversion treat rank as changeable in this life.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Material culture and archaeology
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Material culture is objects and built space left by people. Archaeology recovers them in stratigraphy and infers subsistence, rank, and exchange. Binford stressed function; Hodder stressed meaning. Indian illustrations include Hunsgi, Navdatoli, Bhimbetka, and Harappan weights. Ethnography of living potters and hunters checks how objects enter the soil.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Purushartha is dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. Ashrama is student, householder, forest-dweller, and renouncer. The householder is the stage that must hold artha and kama under dharma. Dumont and Kane treat the pairing as a civilisational ideal. Karve’s ethnography shows that most lives remain in the household stage.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jajmani system : continuity and change
Caste system in India
Jajmani is hereditary service of artisan and serving castes for landed patrons, named by Wiser. Beidelman stressed coercion; Srinivas and Lewis described harvest shares and rites. Ritual calls to barber and priest continue in many villages. Cash wages, mills, land reform, and MGNREGA have broken daily dependence. Epstein’s Mysore villages show the market replacing customary shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.