Q2(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q2 Q2 →

What are the arguments for excluding Narmada Man from Homo erectus category?

Topic: Palaeo-Anthropological evidences from India with special reference to Siwaliks and Narmada basin (Ramapithecus, Sivapithecus and Narmada Man).. Syllabus: 1.2 Palaeo-Anthropological evidences from India with special reference to Siwaliks and Narmada basin (Ramapithecus, Sivapithecus and Narmada Man). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2022 and Palaeo-Anthropological evidences from India with special reference to Siwaliks and Narmada basin (Ramapithecus, Sivapithecus and Narmada Man)..

Revision summary

Narmada Man is the Hathnora skullcap found by Sonakia in 1982. It was first compared with Asian Homo erectus. Higher cranial capacity and a more arched vault argue against that label. The fossil is incomplete and the Narmada gravels are hard to date. Many workers now treat it as archaic Homo sapiens or heidelbergensis grade.

Model answer

Introduction

Narmada Man is the Hathnora calvarium found in the Narmada alluvium in 1982. It was first placed near Homo erectus, and later workers argued that the skull does not fit that box.

Body

The find

  • Arun Sonakia recovered the fossil at Hathnora on the Narmada. It is a partial skullcap, not a face, jaw, or limb set.
  • Early comparison with Java and Zhoukoudian erectus stressed a thick vault and a strong brow.

Arguments for exclusion

  • Cranial capacity estimates sit higher than typical Asian Homo erectus and nearer some archaic Homo sapiens or Homo heidelbergensis readings.
  • The vault is more arched, the parietal is broader, and some metrics sit with later Middle Pleistocene humans, not with classic erectus.
  • The specimen is incomplete. Without face, teeth, and postcrania, erectus is a risky default.
  • Stratigraphy of the Narmada gravels is reworked. Date and associated fauna do not lock the skull to an erectus time-slice.
  • Indian palaeoanthropology after M. L. K. Murty and later reviewers therefore prefers archaic Homo sapiens, Homo heidelbergensis, or an open Middle Pleistocene grade.

Caution

  • Exclusion is a metric and completeness argument. It is not a new complete skeleton. A single calvarium cannot carry a species war by itself.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  H[Hathnora calvarium] --> E[Early erectus label]
  H --> X[Higher capacity arched vault]
  X --> A[Archaic sapiens or heidelbergensis]

Conclusion

Narmada Man is excluded from Homo erectus mainly because of higher capacity, a more arched vault, a poor date, and missing bones. The safer label is a Middle Pleistocene archaic human until more fossils appear.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss the palaeoanthropological significance of Siwaliks of India giving its subdivisions, fossil primate fauna and major primate fossil localities

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Taxonomic status of Ramapithecus in the light of Ramapithecus-Sivapithecus controversy.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Ramapithecus-Sivapithecus debate

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Make a critical appraisal of Megalithic tradition in India with special reference to North-East India

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss the morphological features and phylogenetic Position of Ramapithecus

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Identify the causes of tribal unrest with special reference to North-East India

    View answer →

  7. 2016 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Delineate the salient characteristics of 'Narmada Man' and examine its phylogenetic significance

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Pit-dwellers of Kashmir

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Pit-dwellers of Kashmir lived in sunken Neolithic floors at Burzahom, Gufkral, and Kanispur. Houses later rose on filled pits as mud-and-rubble rectangles. Bone tools, cereals, and dog burials mark mixed subsistence. Sankalia set the valley Neolithic beside other Indian food-producing cultures. The tradition is highland and local, not an Indus copy.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Varna and Buddhism

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Varna is the four-fold Brahmanical rank by birth. Buddhism treated it as a social label, not a bar to nirvana. The sangha was open by conduct, as Ashokan dhamma also implied. Patronage still carried rank into Buddhist society. Ambedkar used that critique in the 1956 conversion.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Dharma versus Religion

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Dharma means duty and order tied to role and group. Religion names a congregational faith with creed and conversion. Kane and Dumont keep dharma as law and hierarchy, not a church. Article 25 forces Indian practice into the legal word religion. Colonial translation flattened duty, sect, and civil law into one noun.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.