Revision summary
North-East tribal movements centre on peoplehood, hill, and political status. Central Indian movements centre on land, forest, and extraction. Naga and Sixth Schedule politics differ from Santhal and Birsa agrarian revolt. Current NE status is talks, councils, and some armed splinters. Current central status is FRA, PESA, Pathalgadi, and anti-mining sabhas.
Model answer
Introduction
North-East tribal movements have been largely about sovereignty, hill, and language vis-à-vis the plains state. Central Indian movements have been largely about land, forest, and diku extraction inside the existing republic.
Body
North-East nature
- The Naga movement demanded a political nation, later a federal bargain, not only a tenancy Act.
- Mizo, Bodo, and other hill movements mixed ethnicity, Inner Line, and Sixth Schedule or statehood.
- Religion and church networks often organised the public, as in Naga areas, which is rare as a core in central India.
Central India nature
- Santhal hul and Birsa ulgulan were agrarian and millenarian against landlords and the colonial forest.
- Later Jharkhand, Gond, and Kondh struggles target mines, dams, and alienated plots under the Fifth Schedule.
- Chipko in the Himalayan belt and Niyamgiri in Odisha are livelihood-and-sacred-hill movements, not secession.
Comparison
- NE: border, Inner Line, armed ceasefire, and autonomous council. Central: tenancy, FRA, PESA, and Gram Sabha.
- Both use identity. The NE identity is more often a people-nation. The central identity is more often Adivasi versus sarkar-and-company.
Current status
- Naga talks remain a framework-and-faction field. Several NE armed groups are in ceasefire or in territorial councils; some splinters still fire.
- Central India: Pathalgadi and related self-rule drives, anti-mining sabhas, and FRA claim struggles continue. Maoist presence overlaps some tribal blocks but is not identical with the tribal movement.
- Jharkhand statehood was a partial political close. Resource conflict did not close with the new capital.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NE[North-East] --> SO[Sovereignty council] CE[Central India] --> LA[Land forest mine] NE --> NA[Naga talks] CE --> NI[Niyamgiri FRA]
Conclusion
North-East movements are political-territorial. Central Indian movements are agrarian-resource. Today the first sits in talks and councils; the second sits in FRA, PESA, and anti-mine sabhas.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Briefly describe the anthropological perspective on development. How have anthropologists contributed in India's rural development?
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Are Maoists the same as the tribal movement in central India?
No. They overlap some areas. Tribal land movements also run through sabhas and law.
-
Did statehood end Jharkhand’s movement?
It closed one political demand. Mine and land conflicts continue.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Highlight the significant contributions of B. S. Guha, Irawati Karve and S. R. K. Chopra to Indian Anthropology -
2024 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy. -
2024 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe ILO's Convention No. 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal people. Is India a signatory to it? -
2023 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the contributions of S.C. Roy to Indian anthropology. -
2022 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Illustrate the contribution of Irawati Karve to Indian Anthropology. Make a special mention of her literary contribution -
2022 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the contributions of S. C. Dube in Indian village studies -
2022 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the views of G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin on the approach towards tribal populations. What are the policies of the Government of India towards Indian tribal populations? -
2022 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Briefly describe the anthropological perspective on development. How have anthropologists contributed in India's rural development?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir lived in sunken Neolithic floors at Burzahom, Gufkral, and Kanispur. Houses later rose on filled pits as mud-and-rubble rectangles. Bone tools, cereals, and dog burials mark mixed subsistence. Sankalia set the valley Neolithic beside other Indian food-producing cultures. The tradition is highland and local, not an Indus copy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varna and Buddhism
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Varna is the four-fold Brahmanical rank by birth. Buddhism treated it as a social label, not a bar to nirvana. The sangha was open by conduct, as Ashokan dhamma also implied. Patronage still carried rank into Buddhist society. Ambedkar used that critique in the 1956 conversion.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dharma versus Religion
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Dharma means duty and order tied to role and group. Religion names a congregational faith with creed and conversion. Kane and Dumont keep dharma as law and hierarchy, not a church. Article 25 forces Indian practice into the legal word religion. Colonial translation flattened duty, sect, and civil law into one noun.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.