Revision summary
Anthropology treats development as social process, not as a drawing. Dube showed Community Development hitting faction at Shamirpet. Elwin tied tribal development to land protection. Village monographs trained the rural bureaucracy to see caste. PESA and FRA carry ethnographic ideas of custom and nistar into law.
Model answer
Introduction
The anthropological perspective on development treats a scheme as a social process among real groups, not as a budget drawing. Indian anthropologists put that view into village studies and into the state.
Body
Perspective
- Development is culture change with winners and brokers. S. C. Dube showed this when Community Development met Shamirpet factions.
- Verrier Elwin insisted that tribal development must not mean loss of land. Isolation versus integration is a development debate, not only a museum debate.
- Later applied anthropology added participation: villagers as analysts, which PRA borrowed. The perspective is sceptical of trickle-down and of a single modernisation ladder.
Contributions in rural India
- Monographs by Dube, Srinivas, and Marriott trained administrators to see caste and faction inside the block office.
- Elwin in NEFA and anthropologists in Tribal Research Institutes wrote handbooks that shaped ITDP manners, if not always ITDP outcomes.
- Land and forest ethnography fed PESA and FRA arguments: nistar, shifting plots, and Gram Sabha as living law.
- Evaluation of nutrition, boarding schools, and displacement is now a standard anthropological job in rural programmes.
Limit
- Contribution is diagnosis and some statute language. It has not stopped leakage. The field still meets the contractor.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[Anthropological view] --> S[Scheme as social process] S --> D[Dube Shamirpet] S --> E[Elwin land] S --> P[PESA FRA participation]
Conclusion
Anthropology sees development as structured social change. In India it contributed village realism, tribal caution, and the intellectual ground of PESA and FRA, not a magic rural plan.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How can a balance be struck between livelihood concern and environmental degradation in the context of shifting cultivation?
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is the anthropological view anti-development?
It is anti-blind development. It asks who gains land and who gains only a meeting.
-
Did anthropologists run ITDPs?
Rarely as line bosses. They wrote the critique and some of the protective law.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Highlight the significant contributions of B. S. Guha, Irawati Karve and S. R. K. Chopra to Indian Anthropology -
2024 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy. -
2024 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe ILO's Convention No. 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal people. Is India a signatory to it? -
2023 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the contributions of S.C. Roy to Indian anthropology. -
2022 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Illustrate the contribution of Irawati Karve to Indian Anthropology. Make a special mention of her literary contribution -
2022 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Assess the contributions of S. C. Dube in Indian village studies -
2022 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the views of G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin on the approach towards tribal populations. What are the policies of the Government of India towards Indian tribal populations? -
2022 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Compare the nature of tribal movements between North-East and Central India. Briefly mention the current status of existing tribal movements in these areas
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir lived in sunken Neolithic floors at Burzahom, Gufkral, and Kanispur. Houses later rose on filled pits as mud-and-rubble rectangles. Bone tools, cereals, and dog burials mark mixed subsistence. Sankalia set the valley Neolithic beside other Indian food-producing cultures. The tradition is highland and local, not an Indus copy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varna and Buddhism
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Varna is the four-fold Brahmanical rank by birth. Buddhism treated it as a social label, not a bar to nirvana. The sangha was open by conduct, as Ashokan dhamma also implied. Patronage still carried rank into Buddhist society. Ambedkar used that critique in the 1956 conversion.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dharma versus Religion
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Dharma means duty and order tied to role and group. Religion names a congregational faith with creed and conversion. Kane and Dumont keep dharma as law and hierarchy, not a church. Article 25 forces Indian practice into the legal word religion. Colonial translation flattened duty, sect, and civil law into one noun.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.