Revision summary
Dube’s Indian Village made Shamirpet a full caste-and-faction monograph. He treated the village as tied to town and state, not as a republic. India’s Changing Villages studied Community Development on the ground. Brokers and factions divert planned benefits. His niche is village structure plus the development state.
Model answer
Introduction
S. C. Dube made the Indian village a study of structure and of planned change, not a timeless little republic. Shamirpet is still the case through which that contribution is taught.
Body
Shamirpet and the village monograph
- Indian Village (1955) on Shamirpet near Hyderabad mapped caste, kinship, faction, ritual, and economy in one settlement.
- He showed the village as a part-society tied to town, state, and market, against the isolated republic myth.
- Comparison with M. N. Srinivas at Rampura and McKim Marriott on festivals shows Dube’s extra stress on administration and development staff.
Development anthropology
- India’s Changing Villages followed Community Development and National Extension into the same social field.
- Dube recorded how schemes meet caste brokers, factions, and official ritual. Benefit does not flow as the plan drawing shows.
- That sceptical ethnography of programmes is his lasting method for later ITDP and panchayat work.
Limit and later use
- Shamirpet is a Telangana case, not all India. North Indian jajmani and Kerala agrarian class need other monographs.
- He was less a kinship theorist than Irawati Karve, and less a Sanskritisation theorist than Srinivas. His niche is village plus development state.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Dube] --> S[Shamirpet monograph] D --> C[Community Development] S --> F[Caste faction state]
Conclusion
Dube’s contribution is the village as a political and administrative field, proven at Shamirpet and in the Community Development studies. He taught that planned change has a social structure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the views of G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin on the approach towards tribal populations. What are the policies of the Government of India towards Indian tribal populations?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q7(a)). View answer →
-
Did Dube say villages are unchanging?
No. He wrote to show change through state, market, and faction.
-
Is Shamirpet typical of India?
It is a strong Deccan case. Typicality is a bad test. The method travels.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Highlight the significant contributions of B. S. Guha, Irawati Karve and S. R. K. Chopra to Indian Anthropology -
2024 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy. -
2024 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe ILO's Convention No. 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal people. Is India a signatory to it? -
2023 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically evaluate the contributions of S.C. Roy to Indian anthropology. -
2022 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Illustrate the contribution of Irawati Karve to Indian Anthropology. Make a special mention of her literary contribution -
2022 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the views of G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin on the approach towards tribal populations. What are the policies of the Government of India towards Indian tribal populations? -
2022 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Compare the nature of tribal movements between North-East and Central India. Briefly mention the current status of existing tribal movements in these areas -
2022 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Briefly describe the anthropological perspective on development. How have anthropologists contributed in India's rural development?
More from this topic
Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Highlight the significant contributions of B. S. Guha, Irawati Karve and S. R. K. Chopra to Indian Anthropology
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Guha: 1931 racial types, ASI institution, Harappan osteology; typology is the limit. Karve: kinship organisation, Maharashtra, epics, north–south marriage contrast. Chopra: Siwalik Sivapithecus school at Chandigarh; Ramapithecus later revised. Together they cover living measurement, civilisation-as-kinship, and Miocene fossils. Keep their questions; update their boxes with genetics and ethnography.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Describe ILO's Convention No. 169 (1989) on Indigenous and Tribal people. Is India a signatory to it?
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
ILO Convention 169 (1989) covers indigenous and tribal peoples and stresses self-identification, consultation, land and custom. It replaced the integrationist Convention 107 (1957). India ratified 107 and has not ratified 169. Indian hesitation cites the ST list, sovereignty and land law; PESA and FRA already resemble 169 in parts. Never state that India is a signatory to 169.
Q2(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy.
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Colonial anthropology served census, forest and criminal-tribe administration. S. C. Roy professionalised ethnography; ASI and university departments Indianised the job. Ghurye versus Elwin was an Indian debate on assimilation and isolation. Srinivas, Karve, Bose, Majumdar and Vidyarthi supplied Indian concepts and village-tribe fields. Autonomy means an Indian agenda and terms, not a refusal of world methods.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.