Revision summary
Structural transformation moves work toward industry and services. In India it is partial; many still live by the farm. Jajmani becomes cash contract, not a vanished caste. Migration and machines remake attached labour as gangs. Dominant-caste land and panchayat brokerage persist.
Model answer
Introduction
Structural transformation is the shift of labour and output from agriculture toward industry and services. In India it has been incomplete, so agrarian social relationships change without fully disappearing.
Body
What transformed
- Green Revolution belts produced surplus, machines, and hired labour. Jajmani grain shares thinned where cash wages paid the harvest.
- Urban services and construction pull circular migrants, as Jan Breman showed, so the attached farm servant becomes a seasonal gang worker.
- Land ceiling and tenancy laws weakened some landlords. Dominant-caste land often remained, now farmed with machines and migrants.
Impact on relationships
- Jajmani hereditary service gives way to contract. The carpenter may still be a caste neighbour, but the tie is a bill.
- Caste hierarchy does not vanish. It reappears in who owns the harvester, who migrates, and who sits in the 73rd Amendment chair.
- Women take more field work as men leave, without equal land title.
- Tribal agrarian ties break faster where mines and forests replace the plough, a harsher transformation than Punjab’s wage harvest.
Incomplete shift
- A large workforce still depends on agriculture. That is why faction, kin, and village remain political facts, as Dube already saw under Community Development.
- N. K. Bose’s civilisation of ranked occupations meets a labour market that ranks by education and network, still caste-shaped social capital.
Reading
- Structural change commodifies labour. It does not automatically produce class without caste. Traditional relationships are monetised more than they are abolished.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[Agrarian order] --> G[Green Revolution cash wage] A --> M[Migration services] J[Jajmani] --> C[Contract] L[Caste land] --> L
Conclusion
India’s structural transformation monetised agrarian ties and sent labour to town. Jajmani thinned. Caste land and brokerage remain the rural social structure under a new wage skin.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe the traditional patterns of settlement of Indian villages
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q3(c)). View answer →
-
Has India left the agrarian society?
Output shares shifted more than labour shares. Village relationships still matter.
-
Did class replace caste on the farm?
Class language grew. Caste still sorts land, marriage, and the contractor.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare and contrast the approaches of M.N. Srinivas and L.P. Vidyarthi to social change in village India. -
2024 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Describe the important Paleolithic sites from South India with suitable examples. What is the significance of South Indian Paleolithic cultures? -
2022 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Globalisation, on one hand has provided opportunities and on the other hand thrown challenges to Indian villages." Elucidate -
2021 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste and social capital -
2021 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions in transforming traditional power hierarchy in rural India -
2016 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the traditional patterns of settlement of Indian villages -
2016 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare the contribution of L. P. Vidyarthi and D. N. Majumdar to the study of Indian tribes -
2016 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain Indian village as a social system with suitable examples
More from this topic
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Describe the important Paleolithic sites from South India with suitable examples. What is the significance of South Indian Paleolithic cultures?
Indian Village
Key sites: Attirampakkam (early dated Acheulian), Hunsgi–Baichbal and Isampur (limestone workshops), Pallavaram (Foote), Kurnool caves and Jwalapuram (later Pleistocene). South India is Acheulian country, distinct from classic Soanian cobble tools. Isampur shows organised quarrying; Attirampakkam shows great antiquity. Middle and Upper Palaeolithic appear in caves and river valleys without copying Europe’s labels. Significance is early occupation and behaviour; makers’ fossils are still scarce.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Compare and contrast the approaches of M.N. Srinivas and L.P. Vidyarthi to social change in village India.
Indian Village
Srinivas explained village change through field view, sanskritisation, westernisation and dominant caste. Vidyarthi explained organisation and change through the sacred complex and the nature–man–spirit complex. Srinivas’s motor is internal rank-climbing plus Western and state resources. Vidyarthi’s motor is contact with development, mine, market and mission. Use both: caste plains and tribal-sacred landscapes are not one model.
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Globalisation, on one hand has provided opportunities and on the other hand thrown challenges to Indian villages." Elucidate
Indian Village
Globalisation links villages to distant labour, media, and crop markets. Remittances and phones are real openings. Land, artisan work, and farm risk are the main threats. Chipko and Niyamgiri show local defence against outside extraction. PESA and FRA are legal tools, not automatic shields.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.