Q2(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · 1 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

Write about the contribution made by Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf to tribal anthropology in India

Topic: Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India. Syllabus: 4. Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India—Contributions of the 18th, 19th and early 20th Century scholar-administrators. Contributions of Indian anthropologists to tribal and caste studies. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India.

Revision summary

Haimendorf wrote major ethnographies of Nagas, Chenchus, and Gonds. He treated tribes as political and legal societies, not racial leftovers. Forest and land loss were his applied theme, near Elwin and Panchsheel. Ghurye’s assimilation was the foil to that caution. The archive remains a backbone of Paper II tribal anthropology.

Model answer

Introduction

Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf built a field archive of Indian tribes from the Naga hills to Hyderabad Agency. He joined ethnography with a practical worry about land and forest.

Body

Monographs and regions

  • Naga work recorded village republics, morung, and feud in the North-East before they were only a security file.
  • Chenchu hunting life in Andhra became a type study of Indian foragers.
  • Gonds of Adilabad and other Deccan groups showed shifting cultivation, clan, and the shock of new administration.

Themes of contribution

  • He treated tribes as political societies with law, not as Risley types.
  • Like Elwin, he warned that forest reservation and money-lenders destroy the base of those societies.
  • He wrote for administrators as well as universities, a Hyderabad and later SOAS habit that fed applied anthropology.

Relation to Indian debates

  • Against Ghurye’s fast assimilation, his detailed custom argued for time and protection, closer to Nehru’s Panchsheel.
  • He did not invent the Fifth Schedule, but his Agency ethnography shows why land law must be special.
  • Later critics note a romantic eye. The contribution still stands as unmatched regional coverage.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  H[Haimendorf] --> N[Naga polities]
  H --> C[Chenchu foragers]
  H --> G[Gond Deccan]
  H --> P[Protection ethic]

Conclusion

Haimendorf contributed comparative tribal ethnography and a land-forest ethic. Indian tribal anthropology still walks his Naga, Chenchu, and Gond paths.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Deconstruct the colonial history of Indian Anthropology highlighting the critical role played by the Indian Anthropologists in sustaining its autonomy.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Critically evaluate the contributions of S.C. Roy to Indian anthropology.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Illustrate the contribution of Irawati Karve to Indian Anthropology. Make a special mention of her literary contribution

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Assess the contributions of S. C. Dube in Indian village studies

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss the views of G. S. Ghurye and Verrier Elwin on the approach towards tribal populations. What are the policies of the Government of India towards Indian tribal populations?

    View answer →

  6. 2022 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Compare the nature of tribal movements between North-East and Central India. Briefly mention the current status of existing tribal movements in these areas

    View answer →

  7. 2022 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Briefly describe the anthropological perspective on development. How have anthropologists contributed in India's rural development?

    View answer →

  8. 2016 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Belan Valley Mesolithic sites include Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha, and Sarai Nahar Rai. Microliths, bone, burial, and wild plant traces mark late foragers. Nearby Koldihwa ties the valley to early rice and cattle experiments. Sankalia set the belt in India’s prehistoric sequence. The significance is a North Indian hunt-to-farm bridge.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Linguistic elements in Indian population

Demographic profile of India

Indian languages group mainly as Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Austroasiatic, and Tibeto-Burman. Grierson mapped that skeleton; the Eighth Schedule ranks some tongues. Families do not equal Risley’s races. Tribes speak all four families. Unscheduled languages still need Article 29 and 350A.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics

Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India

Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.