Revision summary
Living foragers such as Chenchu and Birhor supply analogues for Indian Mesolithic camps. Haimendorf and Elwin recorded hunt, honey, and seasonal mobility. Bhimbetka and Belan finds are read through those kits. No group is a frozen palaeolithic race. FRA and wages are already changing the same traditions.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethno-archaeology reads living foragers to explain old camps. In India it shows hunting-gathering as a surviving economic strand, not a finished prehistory.
Body
Living analogues
- Groups such as Chenchu, Birhor, and some Andaman communities keep hunt, honey, and forest exchange beside wage work.
- Fürer-Haimendorf on the Chenchu and Elwin on forest peoples recorded kits that resemble Mesolithic scatter: microlith-like tools, seasonal camps, and sharing.
- Bhimbetka hunt scenes and Belan microliths gain sense when compared with these camps.
Caution
- No living group is a frozen Mesolithic. FRA and the forest department already reshape the same people.
- Evidence is analogy plus continuity of forest niche, not a racial leftover of Risley.
- Survival is partial: the tradition lives as a skill set inside a mixed tribal economy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Ethno-archaeology] --> C[Chenchu Birhor] E --> M[Mesolithic camps] F[FRA forest law] --> C
Conclusion
Ethno-archaeology in India links Mesolithic camps to living forest foragers. The tradition survives in practice, under legal and market pressure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Write about the contribution made by Christoph von Fürer-Haimendorf to tribal anthropology in India
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Are these groups ‘Stone Age people’?
No. They are contemporary citizens with mixed livelihoods.
-
Does analogy prove a site’s diet?
It suggests possibilities. Bones and residues still have to match.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Critically examine the concept of communalism and its relevance for multi-religious and multiethnic polity of India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Belan Valley Mesolithic sites include Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha, and Sarai Nahar Rai. Microliths, bone, burial, and wild plant traces mark late foragers. Nearby Koldihwa ties the valley to early rice and cattle experiments. Sankalia set the belt in India’s prehistoric sequence. The significance is a North Indian hunt-to-farm bridge.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Linguistic elements in Indian population
Demographic profile of India
Indian languages group mainly as Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Austroasiatic, and Tibeto-Burman. Grierson mapped that skeleton; the Eighth Schedule ranks some tongues. Families do not equal Risley’s races. Tribes speak all four families. Unscheduled languages still need Article 29 and 350A.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.