Q3(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q1(a) Q4(a) →

Give a critical assessment of 'Negrito Problem' in India

Topic: Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization. Syllabus: 1.1 Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization—Prehistoric (Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic and Neolithic-Chalcolithic), Protohistoric (Indus Civilization). Pre-Harappan, Harappan and post-Harappan cultures. Contributions of the tribal cultures to Indian civilization. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization.

Revision summary

The Negrito problem asked if Andamanese and some southern foragers were a first Indian race. Risley and Guha framed it with hair and stature. Looks do not prove African Pygmy kinship or an all-India stratum. Andaman history is isolation and colonial shock. Drop the race problem; keep forager ethnography.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

  • The Negrito problem was a racial puzzle: whether short, dark, curly-haired groups in India, especially Andamanese and some southern hill people, were a leftover first race. The problem was badly posed.

Body

How it was framed

  • Risley, Guha, and earlier travellers used hair and stature to invent a Negrito stratum under Dravidian and Aryan types.
  • Andaman Islanders were the type case. Kadar and other southern foragers were sometimes pulled in.

Critique

  • Hair and height are not a people. Siwalik apes and later genetics show deep mix, not stacked races.
  • Andamanese history is island isolation plus colonial violence, not a museum of all-India origins.
  • Linking them to African Pygmies by look is nineteenth-century analogy, not phylogeny.
  • Ghurye and later anthropologists already doubted that caste and tribe are frozen races.

What remains

  • The useful residue is a research question on Andaman and southern forager diversity, not a ‘problem’ of a missing race.
  • Ethno-archaeology of hunt is a better frame than Negrito stock.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  R[Risley Guha types] --> N[Negrito problem]
  N --> X[Look-alike not phylogeny]
  A[Andaman foragers] --> D[Diversity not stock]

Conclusion

The Negrito problem was a colonial racial leftover. Assess it as a failed classification. Keep the Andaman and forager file without the race ladder.

Quick related

Students also ask

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2021 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Examine the factors responsible for malnutrition in tribal India and suggest interventions required to overcome the problem

    View answer →

  2. 2015 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Discuss how constitutional provisions in India have built-in mechanisms for dealing with the problem of land alienation in tribal areas

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Contribution of L. K. Ananthakrishna Iyer in Anthropology.

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

L. K. Ananthakrishna Iyer is a pioneering figure in Indian anthropology, known for his monumental ethnographic surveys like The Cochin Tribes and Castes and The Mysore Tribes and Castes. Working during the colonial era, he bridged western anthropological methods with indigenous scholarship. His documentation of social stratification, material culture, and folklore laid the empirical foundation for Indian sociology and anthropology. Iyer also established the first department of anthropology in India at the University of Calcutta, shaping institutional teaching and research.

Q5(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Article 371A of the Indian Constitution.

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Article 371A of the Indian Constitution grants special autonomous status to Nagaland, protecting its traditional socio-religious practices, customary laws, and land ownership rights. Enacted via the 13th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1962, following the 16-point Agreement, it reflects the asymmetrical federal framework of India. The article places a special responsibility on the Governor regarding law and order and regional financial allocations. It balances tribal autonomy with national integration, though it faces implementation challenges in modern governance.

PDF