Revision summary
FRA titles need proof that oral jhum lives rarely keep on paper. Forest departments delay or reject many gram sabha claims. Community rights lag behind tiny individual pattas. Mines in Fifth Schedule belts outrun the Act. Women and groves are poorly fitted to the form.
Model answer
Introduction
The Forest Rights Act, 2006, promises individual and community titles to forest dwellers. Scheduled Tribes meet a wall of proof, officials, and overlapping claims when they try to use it.
Body
Proof and process
- Occupancy evidence is demanded for lives that were oral, jhum, and unsurveyed.
- Gram sabha claims are delayed, remanded, or rejected by forest departments that still treat the jungle as their estate.
- Community forest rights, the stronger collective tool, are rarer than small individual patches.
Political and economic blocks
- Mining and plantation ‘public purpose’ in Fifth Schedule Jharkhand, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh race ahead of titles.
- PESA consent is skipped, so FRA becomes a paper after the lease.
- Nehru’s Panchsheel named land first; implementation still names the plantation first.
Social difficulties
- Women and shifting cultivators are under-recorded on pattas.
- NGO help is labelled interference. Without it many hamlets cannot file.
- Vidyarthi’s spirit grove is not a category on the form.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FRA[FRA 2006] --> CL[Claim gram sabha] CL --> R[Rejection delay] M[Mining leases] --> R
Conclusion
ST difficulties with FRA are evidential, departmental, and political. The Act is a rights text; the forest file remains a fortress.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine the factors responsible for the exploitation of scheduled castes in India
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Does FRA apply only to Scheduled Tribes?
STs are central. Other traditional forest dwellers can also claim under the Act.
-
Is rejection always illegal?
Some claims fail the occupancy test. Mass rejection without hearing is the difficulty anthropology flags.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Constitutional Safeguards for Backward Classes. -
2023 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Tribes are backward Hindus." Critically comment with reference to the contributions of G.S. Ghurye. -
2021 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Elucidate the problems and challenges in educational attainment of the Scheduled Tribes -
2016 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the factors responsible for the exploitation of scheduled castes in India -
2016 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Write in detail various provisions provided by the Constitution of India for the scheduled tribes under Fifth and Sixth Schedules -
2016 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the role of NGOs and missionaries in transformation of scheduled tribes in Central India -
2015 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically compare 'Affirmative Action' of USA and 'Protective Discrimination' for Scheduled Tribes in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Belan Valley Mesolithic sites include Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha, and Sarai Nahar Rai. Microliths, bone, burial, and wild plant traces mark late foragers. Nearby Koldihwa ties the valley to early rice and cattle experiments. Sankalia set the belt in India’s prehistoric sequence. The significance is a North Indian hunt-to-farm bridge.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Linguistic elements in Indian population
Demographic profile of India
Indian languages group mainly as Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Austroasiatic, and Tibeto-Burman. Grierson mapped that skeleton; the Eighth Schedule ranks some tongues. Families do not equal Risley’s races. Tribes speak all four families. Unscheduled languages still need Article 29 and 350A.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.