Q7(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q7 Q8 →

Discuss the applicability of various sampling techniques in selecting the study group.

Topic: Marriage. Syllabus: 2.3 Marriage: Definition and universality; Laws of marriage (endogamy, exogamy, hypergamy, hypogamy, incest taboo); Type of marriage (monogamy, polygamy, polyandry, group marriage). Functions of marriage; Marriage regulations (preferential, prescriptive and proscriptive); Marriage payments (bride wealth and dowry). Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Marriage.

Revision summary

Simple random and systematic sampling require a usable frame. Stratification ensures analytically important minorities are represented. Cluster and multistage designs suit dispersed regional surveys but need design-effect adjustment. Purposive sampling selects information-rich cases; theoretical sampling develops concepts. Snowball sampling reaches hidden groups but carries network bias. Anthropological sampling should combine transparent inference, ethnographic depth, non-response analysis and ethics.

Model answer

Introduction

Sampling selects cases from a defined population so that fieldwork is feasible. Its quality depends not on one universally best technique but on fit among research question, sampling frame, mobility, social boundaries and the inference claimed.

Body

Probability designs

  • Simple random sampling gives every listed unit a known equal chance; suitable for a complete village household register, but costly over dispersed terrain.
  • Systematic sampling takes every kth unit after a random start; efficient in settlement lists, unless periodic ordering creates bias.
  • Stratified sampling samples within relevant strata such as sex, age, caste or ecological zone. It ensures small subgroups are represented and can improve precision.
  • Cluster and multistage sampling first select villages or census blocks, then households and persons. This is practical for regional nutrition or morbidity surveys, though intra-cluster similarity enlarges sampling error.

Probability designs support estimable sampling error and population inference, provided non-response and frame omissions are addressed.

Non-probability and adaptive designs

Purposive sampling selects information-rich ritual specialists, healers or fossil collections; quota sampling fills categories without random selection; convenience sampling is fast but weak for generalisation. Snowball sampling, associated with referral chains, reaches stigmatised or hidden groups such as migrants, sex workers or drug users, but over-represents network hubs. Respondent-driven sampling attempts to model referral probabilities under strong assumptions. Theoretical sampling in grounded theory selects new cases to develop emerging concepts until saturation.

Classic intensive ethnography—Malinowski in the Trobriands or M. N. Srinivas in Rampura—often chose a site purposively, then used a census, genealogy and case studies within it. Statistical representativeness and ethnographic depth answer different questions.

Gatekeeper access, seasonal absence, household definitions, refusal and digital exclusion can bias any design. Tribal or vulnerable populations require community consent and protection from re-identification; oversampling a small group must not become extractive surveillance.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  Q[Research question] --> P{Population frame exists?}
  P -->|yes| PR[Probability sample]
  PR --> R[Random stratified or multistage]
  P -->|no or hidden| NP[Non-probability or adaptive]
  NP --> N[Purposive snowball theoretical]
  R --> I[Population inference]
  N --> D[Depth or network access]

Conclusion

Use random, stratified or multistage designs when estimating population patterns; use purposive, theoretical or network designs when mechanisms, rare expertise or hidden populations are the object. Triangulation and honest limits matter more than calling every sample representative.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Customary laws and Environmental conservation.

    View answer →

  2. 2015 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Incest Taboos.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Attributes of culture

The Nature of Culture

Culture is a learned and symbolically mediated design for living. Its core attributes are sharing, symbolism, patterning, adaptation, transmission and change. Tylor supplies the complex whole; Geertz supplies public meaning; Bourdieu links culture to embodied practice. Kula shows integration of exchange, rank, ritual and inter-island relations. Shared culture is never identical experience: gender, class, age and power matter. Treat integration as a question, not as automatic harmony.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Harappan maritime trade

Meaning, Scope and development of Anthropology.

Harappan maritime trade joined Indus rivers and coastal sites to Oman, Bahrain and Mesopotamia. Lothal, Dholavira, Kuntasi, Balakot and Sutkagen-dor were important nodes. Meluhha texts, Indus seals, Gulf materials and etched carnelian beads provide converging evidence. Exports included crafted beads, shell, ivory, timber and probably textiles; metals moved inward. Lothal’s basin may be a dock or reservoir, so do not make the whole case depend on it. Trade supported craft specialisation and urban integration but was not the sole cause of Harappan civilisation.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Critical perspective on avoidance and joking relationship

The Nature of Culture

Avoidance prescribes reserve; joking licenses teasing between named kin categories. Radcliffe-Brown read both as complementary ways of regulating conjunction and separation. Mother-in-law/son-in-law avoidance and cross-cousin or junior-affine joking are common patterns. Symmetrical joking permits reciprocity; asymmetrical joking protects one-sided licence. Gluckman highlights ritualised expression of contradiction. Critical analysis asks whether joking reproduces gendered power and whether rules match actual conduct.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.