Q5(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q5 →

Glottochronology

Topic: Linguistic Anthropology.. Syllabus: (d) Linguistic Anthropology. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2023 and Linguistic Anthropology..

Revision summary

Glottochronology dates language splits from retained basic vocabulary. Swadesh lists and an assumed replacement rate are the core. Hymes helped move the tool into anthropology. Bergsland and Vogt showed that rates vary. It remains a rough relatedness clock, not an absolute date.

Model answer

Introduction

Glottochronology tries to date the split of related languages from the share of retained basic vocabulary. It is a linguistic clock, and anthropologists have used it with more hope than the clock can always keep.

Body

The method

  • Morris Swadesh built 100- and 200-word lists of supposedly stable meanings such as body parts and pronouns, a method called lexicostatistics when used only to measure relatedness.
  • Glottochronology adds a constant rate, often taught as about 14 per cent loss per thousand years, to turn the shared percentage into a date of divergence.
  • Dell Hymes and others brought the tool into anthropology as a companion to archaeology when no inscriptions exist.

Limits

  • Knut Bergsland and Hans Vogt showed that real rates are not constant, using cases such as Icelandic.
  • Borrowing, taboo replacement, and poorly chosen lists break the clock, which Lyle Campbell and historical linguists still stress.
  • The method can still rank closeness of dialects; it should not be treated as a radiocarbon date for a people.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  W[Swadesh list] --> S[Shared basic words]
  S --> D[Date of split]
  C[Rate not constant] --> D

Conclusion

Glottochronology is Swadesh’s dated lexicostatistics. It is a heuristic for language split, not a precise prehistoric calendar.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Menopausal symptoms

    Next question in the 2023 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Is glottochronology the same as the comparative method?

    No. The comparative method reconstructs proto-forms. Glottochronology only dates splits from word lists.

  • Can it date migrations by itself?

    No. It may suggest a time range. Archaeology and genetics must be independent tests.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q6(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Describe briefly the theoretical perspectives in linguistic anthropology to explain the relationship of culture, language and thought

    View answer →

  2. 2021 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Mention the major branches of linguistic anthropology and discuss language use in social and cultural settings

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Scope and relevance of Social and Cultural Anthropology

Social-cultural Anthropology.

Social and cultural anthropology studies learned life in the round, from Tylor’s culture to Boas’s fieldwork. Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown added living systems and social structure. The scope is kinship, economy, politics, religion, and change. Relevance lies in development, health, law, and comparison, as Srinivas and Elwin showed in India. Geertz keeps public meaning inside that same scope.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Cultural impact of Iron Age.

Iron Age

Iron opened heavier soils and denser farming after bronze. Childe linked that productive change to urban and political growth. In India, PGW and NBPW with iron mark the Ganga plains, and Hallur and megaliths mark the south. Craft, coin, war, and kingship are the cultural effects. The Iron Age is a social transformation, not only a metal phase.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Race and Ethnicity.

Race and racism, biological basis of morphological variation of non-metric and metric characters. Racial criteria, racial traits in relation to heredity and…

Race as a few fixed stocks fails Boas’s plasticity evidence and Lewontin’s genetic apportionment. Race still organises inequality as a social category. Ethnicity is a maintained boundary of language, history, and politics, as Barth argued. Cohen showed ethnicity at work in urban competition. In India the same people may be sorted by caste, tribe, or language depending on the boundary in play.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.