Revision summary
Stratification is durable structured inequality. Egalitarian bands limit surplus; ranked chiefdoms give hereditary honour. Class is relation to production (Marx) plus status and party (Weber). Caste ranks endogamous groups by purity and occupation; estates are legal orders. Slavery, social race, and gender are further axes; types mix in living societies.
Model answer
Introduction
Social stratification is structured inequality that lasts beyond one lifetime. Types differ by how rank is inherited, justified, and closed. Simple societies are not all equal, but they are not all caste.
Body
Egalitarian and ranked
- Egalitarian bands, as among many foragers including parts of Andaman life, limit accumulation by sharing and ridicule. Age and sex still differentiate.
- Ranked societies give hereditary prestige without sharp economic classes. Trobriand chiefs and Kachin gumsa nobles sit above commoners. Sahlins contrasted this with Melanesian big-men who earn followings.
Class
- Marx defined class by relation to the means of production: owners and labourers. Peasant and landlord, factory owner and worker, are class types.
- Weber added status honour and party power. A poor Brahmin may have status without class wealth. Class is not only income.
Caste and estate
- Caste in India, as Dumont read in Homo Hierarchicus, ranks groups by purity and occupation, with endogamy and hereditary status. Srinivas stressed mobility through Sanskritisation and dominant caste, against a frozen book-view.
- Estates of feudal Europe (clergy, nobility, commoners) were legal ranks. They are a closed, law-written type, not the same as Indian jati.
Slavery, race, and gender
- Slavery and serfdom are extreme closed strata. Race as a social hierarchy, in colonial and American colour lines, stratifies without being a biological caste of genes.
- Gender and age stratify inside every type. Yanomami village rank and Nuer age-sets show that inequality need not be a state class system.
How types mix
- Modern India shows caste, class, and party together. A type is an analytic pole, not a people with only one inequality.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD STR[Stratification] --> E[Egalitarian band] STR --> R[Rank chiefdom] STR --> C[Class Marx Weber] STR --> CA[Caste Dumont] STR --> SL[Slavery race gender]
Conclusion
Stratification runs from sharing bands to rank, class, caste, estate, and slave systems. Examples from Trobriand, Kachin, Nuer, India, and industrial class show the range. Weber and Dumont name different axes of the same fact of rank.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the bio-social determinants of fertility and fecundity
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is class the same as caste?
Class is economic position and can be more open. Caste is hereditary, often endogamous, and morally ranked.
-
Do simple societies lack stratification?
Many lack class. Age, gender, and ritual rank still stratify persons.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q3(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the drawbacks in assuming culture as an 'integrated-closed system in understanding of contemporary society -
2024 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Examine critically the concept of social stratification as a basis for sustaining social inequality. -
2016 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Differences between Social Anthropology and Sociology. -
2015 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Society and Culture.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Animism and Deep Ecology
Religion
Tylor’s animism is belief in spiritual beings as the minimum of religion. Later work reads animism as relating to animals and places as persons. Naess’s Deep Ecology gives nature intrinsic worth beyond human use. The two meet as critiques of a dead, owned environment. They are not the same theory and must not revive Tylor’s ladder.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory
Family
Marriage regulations forbid and prefer categories of spouse. Alliance theory reads marriage as exchange that constitutes society. Lévi-Strauss contrasted restricted and generalised exchange. Kachin and Dravidian systems illustrate positive alliance. Weiner’s Trobriand work shows women as givers, not only gifts.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Historical Particularism and Franz Boas
Historical particularism (Boas)
Historical particularism treats each culture as a unique historical product. Boas rejected Morgan–Tylor unilinear stages. Diffusion and invention must be proved, not assumed from similarity. Race, language, and culture are independent. Heirs used culture areas and texts; the risk is trait-listing.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.