Q5(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q5 →

Rhodesian Man

Topic: Rhodesian man.. Syllabus: (d) Rhodesian man. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Rhodesian man..

Revision summary

Rhodesian Man is the 1921 Kabwe skull from Zambia. Woodward named Homo rhodesiensis. It is a heavy-browed archaic Homo of the Middle Pleistocene. Many now file it with heidelbergensis or a related grade. It is a fossil, not a racial label for living people.

Model answer

Introduction

Rhodesian Man is the Kabwe skull from Zambia, once Northern Rhodesia. It is a robust archaic Homo fossil, not a living race.

Body

The find

  • A. S. Woodward named Homo rhodesiensis in 1921 from Broken Hill (Kabwe) mine.
  • The skull has a huge supraorbital torus, a low vault, and a cranial capacity in the later Homo range.
  • Dates are debated; many now place it in the Middle Pleistocene.

How it is classified

  • Older texts kept a separate species. Many workers now sink it in Homo heidelbergensis or a broad archaic grade beside Bodo and Saldanha.
  • Dental disease on the specimen is famous; it is pathology, not a type character.
  • It is African archaic Homo, relevant to the later rise of H. sapiens, not a ‘missing link’ cartoon.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  KM[Kabwe Broken Hill] --> RH[Rhodesian Man]
  RH --> AR[Archaic Homo heidelbergensis grade]
  AR --> SA[Later sapiens debate]

Conclusion

  • Rhodesian Man is the Kabwe calvaria: a Middle Pleistocene African archaic Homo. The name is historical; the biology sits with heidelbergensis-grade fossils.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Neolithic Cultures of India

    Next question in the 2016 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Is Rhodesian Man a Neanderthal?

    No. It is African archaic Homo. Neanderthals are a western Eurasian sister group.

  • Should answers still use the species name?

    Use Kabwe and note the naming history. Species splitting is unsettled.

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Differences between Social Anthropology and Sociology.

The Nature of Society

Social anthropology grew from intensive fieldwork in small-scale societies. Sociology grew from industrial class, state, and survey. Malinowski versus Durkheim is the textbook origin split. Srinivas and Béteille show the Indian overlap. The wall is departmental, not a law of nature.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Cultural Relativism

The Nature of Culture

Relativism asks that custom be read in its own history. Boas used it against unilinear racial stages. Herskovits and Benedict spread it as method and public teaching. It is a brake on ethnocentrism, not a moral blank cheque. Rights debates mark its political edge.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Lineage and Clan

Kinship

Lineage members can show genealogical links to an ancestor. Clan members share a putative ancestor and often a totem. Lineages nest inside clans in many segmentary systems. Nuer feud and fusion made the distinction famous. Both groups are commonly exogamous.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.