Correct answer: (b) Both 1 and 2
Explanation
- A
Only 1
(a) Only 1. Statement 1 is true—Satavahana kings patronised Prakrit (Nasik–Naneghat inscriptions, Gatha Saptasati)—but statement 2 is also true, so ‘only 1’ drops a valid limb.
- B
Both 1 and 2
(b) Both 1 and 2. Satavahanas used Prakrit as a public language of grants and literature, and their age encouraged popular Buddhist art at Amaravati, Nagarjunakonda and stupa sites. Both statements hold; that is the official key.
- C
Only 2
(c) Only 2. This keeps the art statement and wrongly discards Prakrit patronage.
- D
Neither 1 nor 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2. Both limbs are standard Deccan history, so neither-false is wrong.
Summary. Official key is (b) Both 1 and 2. Satavahana epigraphy and Hala’s Gatha Saptasati show Prakrit nurture. Amaravati sculpture shows a public, popular Buddhist art, not only courtly Sanskrit forms. Dropping either statement is therefore wrong. Neighbouring Deccan facts include Gautamiputra Satakarni and the conflict with the Western Kshatrapas.