Q20 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2021 · GS IV · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q19

Rajeev was a migrant labourer. One day, while going on the road on his bicycle, a car pushed his bicycle. Rajeev dragged the driver out of the car and began abusing him. The driver took out a knife and, after stabbing him three or four times, fled. Onlookers delayed taking Rajeev to hospital and, due to excessive bleeding, he died. If you were in place of Rajeev, what would you have done about the driver’s irresponsible driving? People often show indifferent or passive attitude towards such road accidents and accident victims. Discuss its causes and suggest remedies.

Topic: Attitude. Syllabus: Attitude — Content, structure, function, its influence, and relation with thought and behavior. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Attitude.

Revision summary

Do not drag or abuse the driver; note the plate, call 112, and seek CCTV. Irresponsible driving is a State and evidence problem, not a street humiliation. Onlooker delay comes from bystander effect, police fear, class bias, filming, and samaritan myths. Remedies are Good Samaritan protection, 108 drills, cameras, helper-friendly police, and cashless emergency care. A bleeding migrant is not a spectacle.

Model answer

Introduction

A shove from a car, a dragged driver, a knife, and a delayed hospital run turned a traffic wrong into a death. The ethics split in two: what the cyclist should do with rage, and why the crowd let a bleeding man wait.

Body

If in Rajeev’s place

  • Do not drag the driver out or abuse him. That escalation turned a crash into a stabbing range and is not a lawful remedy.
  • Note the number plate, colour, and direction; call 112 at once; move to a visible, safer edge if you can still ride or walk.
  • Ask nearby shops for CCTV; do not chase the car into a fight.
  • If injured, sit, signal for help, and keep pressure on a wound rather than settling a score.
  • Later: FIR, medico-legal record, insurance, and labour-welfare help as a migrant; a civil claim is a tool, a street beating is not.
  • Irresponsible driving is answered by evidence and the State, not by humiliation that invites a weapon.

Why onlookers stay passive

  • Bystander effect: many faces, no named owner of the duty.
  • Fear of police hours, a false case, and “who will pay the hospital.”
  • Class and migrant invisibility: a labourer on a cycle is coded as less urgent than a car.
  • Spectacle and phone-filming replace aid.
  • Blood, legal ignorance, and the myth that moving a victim always kills.
  • Weak samaritan confidence: people wait for “someone official.”

Remedies

  • Teach and publicise Good Samaritan protection (Supreme Court, MoRTH) so that aid is not treated as guilt.
  • 108 / 112 drills in mohallas, factories, and unions; cheap trauma kits at chowks.
  • Cameras and e-challan so that the first wrong — rash driving — is owned by the plate, not by a fist.
  • Fast police process that does not harass the helper; fine the filmer who blocks aid.
  • Migrant helplines and cashless emergency care so class does not decide the wait.
  • School and media work on “you are the first responder,” not a comment box.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Car shove] --> E[Evidence call 112]
  C --> F[Drag abuse]
  F --> K[Knife death]
  E --> H[Hospital]
  B[Bystander fear] --> D[Delay]
  G[Good Samaritan] --> H

Conclusion

Rajeev’s injury deserved evidence and an ambulance, not a dragged driver. The crowd’s delay was fear, diffusion of duty, and the labourer’s invisibility. Remedy is legal protection for helpers, working emergency numbers, and a culture that treats a bleeding stranger as urgent.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • If the driver tries to flee, may I hold him?

    A proportionate, non-lethal holding until police arrive can be justified. Dragging, beating, and abuse are not, and they risk a weapon.

  • Does filming help?

    A short clip of the plate and the aid can help the case. Standing in the way to film a dying man is the passive attitude this question names.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q1 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Differentiate between democratic attitude and bureaucratic attitude of public servants.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q2 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Explain the role of persuasion in relation to public protest with proper argument.

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q6 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Define attitude in historical perspective and discuss the relationship between aptitude and attitude.

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q16 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    What do you understand by moral and political attitude of human beings? How will you justify these in the present political scenario?

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q17 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Discuss the root causes of gender-related negative attitude. Why is it so rigid?

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q18 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Discuss the factors which influence the formation of an individual’s attitude towards social problems with the help of suitable examples.

    View answer →

  7. 2020 · Q10 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Explain the importance of persuasive communication in attitudinal change.

    View answer →

  8. 2020 · Q19 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Social influence and persuasion contributed in controlling the spread of the Corona Virus in India. Discuss.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

Does individual morality have a bearing effect on the decision of public life?

Ethics and Human Interface

Public decisions are signed by persons, so private honesty and restraint shape the file. Integrity is a personal virtue that must appear as a speaking order, not as a slogan. Private creed may not replace equality, impersonality, or statute. Conduct rules punish the private vice that enters the noting. When conscience and duty clash, recusal or resignation is honest; a secret veto is not.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

What are the essential virtues which are responsible for an ideal human ethical behaviour according to Mahatma Gandhi? Discuss.

Moral thinkers and philosophers

Gandhi’s ethics is a daily vow, not a speech. Satya, ahimsa, asteya, aparigraha, restraint, and fearlessness are the core. Labour, swadeshi, equal respect for faiths, and the end of untouchability complete the public face. The vows work as one: greed or fear breaks the rest. For a civil servant they mean a truthful noting and non-injury under statute, not a pulpit.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

‘Corruption causes misuse of government treasury, administrative inefficiency and obstruction in national development.’ Give suggestions for prevention of corruption in public life in the context of the statement given.

Probity in Governance

Corruption misuses public money, slows honest work, and turns schemes into rent. Prevention cuts discretion through published rules, e-office, and speaking orders. RTI, social audit, DBT, and asset disclosure shrink the dark market. Vigilance and whistle-blower protection must not punish the complainant. Appraisal should reward a reasoned refusal, and political funding must not sell the file from above.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.