Q3 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2021 · GS IV · 8 marks · ~125 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q2 Q4 →

‘Corruption causes misuse of government treasury, administrative inefficiency and obstruction in national development.’ Give suggestions for prevention of corruption in public life in the context of the statement given.

Topic: Probity in Governance. Syllabus: Probity in Governance — concept of public service, philosophical basis of governance and probity. Right to Information, codes of ethics, codes of conduct, citizens' charter, work culture, quality of service delivery. Challenges of corruption. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Probity in Governance.

Revision summary

Corruption misuses public money, slows honest work, and turns schemes into rent. Prevention cuts discretion through published rules, e-office, and speaking orders. RTI, social audit, DBT, and asset disclosure shrink the dark market. Vigilance and whistle-blower protection must not punish the complainant. Appraisal should reward a reasoned refusal, and political funding must not sell the file from above.

Model answer

Introduction

Corruption is not a private stain only. It steals the treasury, slows the file, and turns a development scheme into a rent. Prevention is a mix of law, systems that reduce discretion, and a service that cannot hide.

Body

What the statement gets right

  • Misuse of the treasury is the first wound: a padded bill, a ghost beneficiary, or a delayed work that needs a cut.
  • Administrative inefficiency follows because the officer’s time goes to bargaining, not to service, and honest staff learn that speed is punished.
  • National development is obstructed when roads, schools, and hospitals exist on paper, and the poor pay twice — tax and bribe.

Prevention in public life

  • Reduce discretion at the counter: published criteria, e-office, online tracking, and a speaking order that a citizen can contest.
  • Enforce the Prevention of Corruption Act, Lokayukta and vigilance routes, and the Whistle Blowers Protection Act so that a complaint is not a career death.
  • Use the Right to Information Act and proactive disclosure of tenders, waiting lists, and beneficiary rolls; darkness is the market of the cut.
  • Separate the sanctioning officer from the paying officer, rotate sensitive posts, and declare assets that can be matched to lifestyle.
  • Protect the honest noting: appraisal should reward a reasoned “no”, not only a quiet “yes” that later explodes in audit.
  • Citizen charters, social audit, and direct benefit transfer cut the middleman where the leak is thickest.
  • Political and electoral funding transparency matters, because a public servant cannot stay clean if the file is sold above the office.

Ethics, not only traps

  • Training in integrity is useless if the first month in the field teaches that the cut is normal. Leadership example and swift, fair inquiry must travel together.
  • Technology without a hearing becomes a new rent; prevention needs both a digital trail and a human grievance door.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  C[Corruption] --> T[Treasury leak]
  C --> I[Inefficiency]
  C --> D[Blocked development]
  S[Disclosure and e-office] --> P[Prevention]
  L[Law and vigilance] --> P

Conclusion

Corruption drains the treasury, dulls the office, and stalls development. Prevention is less oral sermon and more inspectable systems, protected complainants, and punishment that does not spare the powerful.

Quick related

Students also ask

Same topic · past papers

UPPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2025 · Q20 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    You hold a responsible position in district. One day in the morning you received a call from the school of your 11-year-old son that you are required to come and meet the principal. You proceed to the school and find your son in the principal's office. The principal informs you that your son had been found wandering aimlessly in the ground during the time classes were in progress. The class teacher further informs you that your son has lately become a loner and did not respond to the questions in the class, he has also been unable to perform well in the football trials held recently. You bring your son back from the school and in the evening along with your wife try to find out the reasons for your son's changed behaviour. After repeated cajoling your son shares that some children had been making fun of him in the class as well as in the WhatsApp group of the student by calling him stunted, stupid and frog. He tells you the names of a few children who were the main culprits but pleaded with you to let the matter rest. After a few days, during a sporting event, where you and your wife have gone to watch your son play, one of your colleague's son shows you a video in which students have caricatured your son. Further, he also points out to the perpetrators who were sitting in the stand. You purposefully walk past them with your son and go home. Next day you find on social media, a video denigrating you, your son and even your wife, stating that you were engaged in physical bullying of children on the sports field. The video became viral on social media. Your friends and colleagues began calling you to find out the details. One of your juniors advised you to make a counter video giving the background and explaining that nothing had happened on the field. You, in turn, posted a video which you had captured during the sports event, identifying the likely perpetrators who were responsible for your son's predicament. You have also narrated what has actually happened in the field and made attempts to bring out the adverse effects of the misuse of social media. (a) Based on the above case study, discuss the ethical issues involved in the use of social media. (b) Discuss the pros and cons of using social media by you to put across facts to counter the fake propaganda against your family.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks · Solution

Does individual morality have a bearing effect on the decision of public life?

Ethics and Human Interface

Public decisions are signed by persons, so private honesty and restraint shape the file. Integrity is a personal virtue that must appear as a speaking order, not as a slogan. Private creed may not replace equality, impersonality, or statute. Conduct rules punish the private vice that enters the noting. When conscience and duty clash, recusal or resignation is honest; a secret veto is not.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks · Solution

What are the essential virtues which are responsible for an ideal human ethical behaviour according to Mahatma Gandhi? Discuss.

Moral thinkers and philosophers

Gandhi’s ethics is a daily vow, not a speech. Satya, ahimsa, asteya, aparigraha, restraint, and fearlessness are the core. Labour, swadeshi, equal respect for faiths, and the end of untouchability complete the public face. The vows work as one: greed or fear breaks the rest. For a civil servant they mean a truthful noting and non-injury under statute, not a pulpit.

Q4 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks · Solution

Describe the relevance of the following in the context of civil services: (a) Ethical Governance (b) Probity in public life.

Civil Service aptitude and values

Ethical governance is inspectable, people-centred use of official power. It is relevant because the civil servant turns policy into a lived yes or no. Nolan’s principles and the Second ARC give the working map. Probity is uprightness: no cut, no hidden conflict, no false noting. Without both, skill becomes a more efficient rent.

PDF