Revision summary
Anger seeks to punish and narrows hearing at home and in the office. It produces bruises, rumination, hidden bad news, and humiliating counters. Control is naming, breathing, delaying the punitive order, and using a second mind on sensitive files. Alcohol and public blasts are not control. Calm firmness can still defend a right; stuffing rage into year-round sarcasm is not the cure.
Model answer
Introduction
Anger is a surge that seeks to punish. Uncontrolled, it breaks a home and a file. Control is not the death of feeling; it is a pause that returns the person to judgement.
Body
Harm in personal life
- Anger turns a spouse or a child into an enemy for a minute that can leave a lasting bruise, a word, or a door slammed on trust.
- It narrows attention: the angry person rehearses injury and cannot hear apology or fact.
- Health follows: sleep, blood pressure, and the habit of rumination that keeps the fight alive after the event.
- Children copy the style; a house of rage teaches that power is a raised voice.
Harm in work life
- An angry order is often a disproportionate order: a harsh notice, a communal remark, a locked door on a trembling claimant.
- Subordinates hide bad news; the office then flies blind.
- Citizens remember humiliation longer than a correct circular.
- Teams fragment; the officer who explodes in review meetings buys fear, not quality.
How it can be controlled
- Name it early: “I am angry” is emotional intelligence, not weakness.
- Insert a delay: leave the chair, drink water, write the noting the next morning, do not sign a punitive order in heat.
- Body tools: slow breath, a walk, no public shouting at a junior or a petitioner.
- Cognitive tools: separate the event from the story of insult; ask what the file actually needs.
- Institutional tools: a speaking order, a second officer on a sensitive hearing, counselling through CGHS or state wellness, and a rule that FIRs and demolitions wait for a cooled note.
- Relational tools at home: a time-out agreement, no decisions about children in the spike, apology when the spike injured.
- Do not use alcohol or a social-media blast as control; those are new harms.
What control is not
- Control is not stuffing rage until it becomes sarcasm all year.
- It is not indifference to injustice; a calm, lawful firmness can still protect a right.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[Anger surge] --> P[Pause and name] P --> D[Delayed noting] D --> J[Judgement]
Conclusion
Anger injures the people one loves and the people one governs. Control is a named pause, a delayed pen, and institutions that refuse heat as policy.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"It is said that government servants take bribe because people offer bribe to them. If people stop offering bribe, the problem of bribe will be solved." What is your opinion about the statement? Examine critically.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q17). View answer →
-
Is a short temper just a personality?
Personality may load the trigger. Office still owes a controlled pen. Training and delay are duties, not optional manners.
-
Should I never show anger at injustice?
Moral outrage can alert you. The act that follows must still be lawful, proportionate, and written after the spike.
Same topic · past papers
UPPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks · Solution
Discuss the role of family, society and educational institutions in inculcating values.
Civil Service aptitude and values
Family plants trust, empathy, and honour through daily example, and can also plant prejudice. Society rewards or punishes those habits in the street, the market, and the media. School adds public reason so a value can be justified beyond the clan. Nai Talim, mid-day meals, and civic assemblies practise equality the lecture cannot. Office ethics overlay these maps; they do not replace them.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks · Solution
Discuss the role of the 'Right to Information' for transparency in governance.
Probity in Governance
RTI converts the citizen’s wish to see the file into a legal claim. Section 4 suo motu disclosure is the ethical heart; applications are the backstop. Second ARC treated RTI as a master key to good governance. Social audits of wages, rations, and contracts rest on that key. Exemptions must stay narrow, and the applicant must be safe, or transparency dies in practice.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS4 · 8 marks · Solution
"The requirement of government sanction for prosecuting dishonest officials is a protective shield for corruption." Examine the statement.
Probity in Governance
Prior sanction was meant to protect bona fide official acts from motivated FIRs. Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 of the PC Act are the usual locks. Endless delay, not the lock itself, is the shield for corruption. Second ARC and CVC lines wanted a clock and a reasoned order, including deemed sanction. Reform the timeline and the speaking order; do not abolish every filter.