Q19 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2019 · GS IV · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 3 min read

← Q18 Q20 →

What factors influence the formation of a person’s attitude towards social problems? Support your answer with examples.

Topic: Attitude. Syllabus: Attitude — Content, structure, function, its influence, and relation with thought and behavior. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2019 and Attitude.

Revision summary

Attitude is belief plus feeling plus readiness to act toward a social problem. It is learned from family, caste, class interest, peers, media, religion, and State example. Dissonance and authoritarianism harden blame of the weak. Equal-status contact and lived postings can soften a stereotype; master–servant contact may worsen it. Swachh Bharat and a PHC posting show that toilets, law, and experience move attitudes more than a lone sermon.

Model answer

Introduction

An attitude toward a social problem is a lasting mix of belief, feeling, and action-readiness — for example, toward beggary, caste violence, or open defecation. It is formed, not downloaded at birth. Family, peers, media, class interest, and contact with the sufferer all write on that slate.

Body

Psychological building blocks

  • Affect, cognition, and behaviour (ABC): fear of “the other,” a story that they are lazy, and a vote or a donation that follows.
  • Learning: classical pairing (a riot image with a community), operant reward (praise for a “tough” post on crime), and modelling of parents who sneer at a domestic worker.
  • Cognitive dissonance: a person who exploits a farm labourer may harden the attitude that labourers “drink their wage,” to protect the self.
  • Personality and moral development: authoritarian submission (Adorno) and Kohlberg’s stages shape whether a problem is seen as order, loyalty, or rights.

Social and structural factors

  • Family and caste socialisation: a child taught that a Dalit well is impure forms an attitude to untouchability before any textbook.
  • Class and material interest: a landlord’s attitude to land reform, or a contractor’s to labour inspection, tracks the purse as much as the heart.
  • Education and curriculum: a civics class on Article 17 can shift cognition; a coaching culture that only ranks can dull empathy for the failed peer.
  • Peers and workplace: a police lock-up culture can normalise custodial cruelty as “attitude toward crime.”
  • Media and social media: repeated frames of the poor as cheats, or of women as responsible for assault, cultivate availability bias.
  • Religion and reform traditions: a satsang that blesses charity, or a movement like the Self-Respect movement, can recode a problem as injustice not fate.
  • Law and State example: SC/ST Act enforcement, or a Chief Minister who mocks a community, teaches what is permitted feeling.

Contact and experience

  • Allport’s contact hypothesis: equal-status work in a disaster camp can soften a communal attitude; unequal contact (master–servant) can worsen it.
  • Personal victimhood: a riot survivor’s attitude to “the other” may freeze unless justice and counselling intervene.
  • Example: Swachh Bharat shifted many urban attitudes to open defecation from “private habit” to public shame — media plus toilets plus leadership, not one lecture.
  • Example: a medical student’s week in a PHC can turn “malnutrition is ignorance” into “malnutrition is wages and water.”

Why attitudes stick and how they change

  • They serve functions: knowledge, ego-defence, value-expression, and social adjustment (Katz).
  • Change needs a new incentive, a trusted messenger, and a chance to act (a shramdaan, a FIR, a vote), not only a slogan.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  F[Family class media] --> A[Attitude ABC]
  C[Contact law education] --> A
  A --> B[Vote donation cruelty or help]

Conclusion

Attitudes to social problems grow from learning, family, class interest, media, law, and contact. Examples from caste, sanitation, and the PHC show that the State can recode feeling only if experience and interest also move.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q10 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Explain the importance of persuasive communication in attitudinal change.

    View answer →

  2. 2019 · Q6 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Differentiate between democratic attitude and bureaucratic attitude of public servants.

    View answer →

  3. 2019 · Q7 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Explain the merits and demerits of persuasion in relation to public protest.

    View answer →

  4. 2018 · Q7 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Discuss the functions of attitude.

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q8 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Differentiate between the following: (a) Attitude and value. (b) Attitude and opinion.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Nishant is a socially sensitive, socialist, intellectual and professor. Through his articles, speeches and media, he raises the voices of labourers, minorities, downtrodden, women and tribals. A party keeps him in its think tank. In this sequence once he calls the members of civil society, intellectuals, politicians and officers to get their children admitted in the government schools. In the season of admissions, the elite schools are highly criticised for their criteria and its impact on education and Nishant also joins in these criticism; meanwhile it comes out that Nishant himself is trying to get his child admitted in an elite school. People condemn this attitude of Nishant and say that his action and words are mismatched. Question therefore is: (i) Should Nishant get his child admitted in the government school? (ii) Should Nishant leave his intellectual discourses? (iii) Should he call his party followers in his favour? (iv) Or should he try to get the admission of his child in the elite school? Discuss.

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q16 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Explain the importance of persuasive communication to change the attitudes of the masses.

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q19 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    “Attitudes are the result of our experiences.” Explain and evaluate the factors responsible for attitude formation in the context of this statement.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

What is ethics? Explain its role in human life.

Ethics and Human Interface

Ethics is systematic reflection on right, duty, and the good life, distinct from mere custom or statute. Aristotle, Kant, dharma, and Gandhi supply maps of habit, respect, role, and means. It guides choice when interest and fear pull apart, and it makes queues and contracts possible. In public life it appears as truthful noting and a speaking order. It also forbids imposing a private creed on a citizen.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

What is the process of strengthening the moral values? Whether strengthening of moral values helps in character-building? Discuss.

Civil Service aptitude and values

Values grow by habituation, trusted models, apology, and institutions that reward fairness. Public reason asks a value to be justified beyond the clan. Character is those values become a stable will when unwatched. Strengthening helps character only when the act meets cost and the office does not punish honesty. A drilled honour that refuses fact is rigidity, not republican character.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

Write short notes on: (A) Ethical responsibilities of public servant. (B) Public interest and the right to information.

Probity in Governance

Ethical responsibility is fidelity to the Constitution, truthful files, neutrality, and citizen-centric delivery. Illegal oral orders are answered on file, not in secret obedience. Public interest is the open community’s welfare, not office comfort. RTI 2005 makes information the rule; Section 4 and speaking orders serve that rule. Exemptions protect privacy and security; vendetta is not public interest.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.