Q17 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2018 · GS IV · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 3 min read

← Q16 Q18 →

“In essence emotional intelligence is not a theoretical concept but a multidimensional social skill.” Explain the concept and dimensions of emotional intelligence in the context of the statement.

Topic: Emotional Intelligence. Syllabus: Emotional Intelligence — concept and dimensions, its utility and application in administration and governance. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and Emotional Intelligence.

Revision summary

EI is the skill of perceiving, using, understanding, and managing emotion in live relationships. It is multidimensional: self-awareness, regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skill can fail separately. The statement is right that a quoted model is not yet a counter-skill. Public service proves EI in riots, grief, and unlawful oral pressure. Empathy without ethical brakes can become manipulation; both limbs are required.

Model answer

Introduction

Emotional intelligence is the capacity to notice, name, and steer feeling — one’s own and others’ — so that a relationship and a task still hold. The statement is right to refuse a seminar definition that never reaches a counter. EI is a social skill with several limbs, proved in a riot queue, a weeping complainant, and a cabinet that is shouting.

Body

Concept in the light of the statement

  • Salovey and Mayer framed EI as a mental ability: perceive, use, understand, and manage emotion.
  • Goleman popularised it as workplace competence: self and social, awareness and management.
  • “Not merely theoretical” means an officer can quote Goleman and still slam a file; the test is conduct under heat.
  • “Multidimensional social skill” means it is not one temperament (being “nice”). It is a bundle that can be trained, observed, and failed one limb at a time.
  • In public service it is how Article 21 is felt at the window, not only cited in a note.

Ability dimensions (Salovey–Mayer)

  • Perceiving emotion: reading a silent woman at a police desk, a child’s fear, a minister’s performative rage.
  • Using emotion to think: letting urgency speed a relief truck without letting panic invent a communal culprit.
  • Understanding emotion: knowing that a farmer’s anger may be shame plus debt, not only “indiscipline.”
  • Managing emotion: cooling one’s own insult after a viral clip, and helping a crowd step back from a spark.

Goleman’s mixed model as social skill

  • Self-awareness: naming one’s caste heat, fatigue, and vanity before they enter a posting list.
  • Self-regulation: delay, recusal, and a civil tone when a relative’s tender appears.
  • Motivation: nishkama persistence when a sanitation target is thankless.
  • Empathy: taking the worst-off person’s scene as real, which Rawls and a good tehsildar share.
  • Social skill: negotiation, team repair, public communication that persuades without a dog-whistle.

Why multidimensionality matters

  • A charming speaker can lack self-regulation (a communal tweet).
  • A self-controlled introvert can lack empathy (a technically perfect, cruel eviction).
  • Training must therefore be several drills: listening, naming feeling, conflict, and ethical brakes — not a single IQ-style number.
  • Culture shapes display rules; Indian official EI includes respect for age and grief without becoming patronage.

Public-service illustrations

  • Crowd control that treats a procession as persons, not a statistic.
  • A collector who absorbs a minister’s shout and still writes a lawful noting.
  • Health staff in an epidemic who manage fear without humiliating a patient.
  • Failure mode: using “EI” as manipulation — reading a widow to close a file cheaply.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  EI[Emotional intelligence] --> S[Self awareness regulation]
  EI --> O[Empathy social skill]
  S --> C[Conduct under heat]
  O --> C
  T[Theory only] --> F[File slammed]

Conclusion

  • Emotional intelligence is a practised, many-limbed social skill: perceive, understand, and govern feeling so that dignity and the task survive. The statement correctly demotes theory. An officer’s EI is not a certificate; it is the difference between a speaking order that heals and a clever order that humiliates.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q9 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    Explain the role of emotional intelligence for good governance and administration.

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q11 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    What do you understand by Ethical Governance? Elucidate with example.

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q4 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    What do you understand by emotional intelligence? Discuss its dimensions.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q17 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Explain with suitable examples the ethical issues in corporate governance.

    View answer →

  5. 2021 · Q8 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    ‘Emotional Intelligence is very important in effective administrative practices.’ Throw light on this statement.

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q6 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    How will you apply emotional intelligence in administrative practices? Explain.

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q18 · UPGS4 · 12 marks

    Discuss the utility of Emotional Intelligence in administration.

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q9 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

    “Effective administration requires dedication towards Public Service.” Explain.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

What are the values? Throw light over their central elements.

Civil Service aptitude and values

A value is a stable criterion of the worthy, not a passing mood or an unexamined habit. It differs from need and from law, though it must live with both. Central elements are stability, preferential ranking, cognition joined to affect, and a force that issues in conduct. Values are socially taught yet open to public reason, and they sit in a hierarchy when goods clash. A wall motto that never meets a file is not yet a value.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

Define the ethical concerns in Government and Private Institutions.

Ethics and Human Interface

Government ethics is fiduciary: tax and force are not a private purse. Concerns are equality, neutrality, open files, conflict of interest, and the weakest user’s dignity. Private ethics is profit that must still justify wage, product, effluent, and books. Concerns are misselling, labour chains, capture, and data power. Both can lie; only the state owes the Constitution first.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS4 · 8 marks

What is the philosophical basis of probity in the governance? Discuss critically.

Probity in Governance

Probity is inspectable upright dealing, not a private glow. Its basis is trust (Locke, Gandhi), Kantian respect, Aristotelian and dharmic habit, Weberian impersonality, and Ambedkar’s constitutional morality. Critique: sermons fail without CVC, PCA, and a trail; rigor without equity can crush; virtue can be theatre; utility can excuse a bribe; dharma can become caste. The officer’s test is a speaking file under cost.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.