Revision summary
Terrorism hits internal security through killing, fear, polarisation, and terror finance. Corruption hits it by selling checkpoints, intelligence files, and procurement. The two feed each other when access can be bought. NIA, UAPA, FATF-style trails, and the Prevention of Corruption Act are the legal kit. They are not the only threats: riots, cyber, organised crime, and LWE also hollow the State.
Model answer
Introduction
Internal security is the State’s hold over violence, borders of the mind, and the public’s trust that a uniform is not for sale. Terrorism attacks that hold with bombs and fear. Corruption attacks it with a hole in the same uniform. Both hinder security; a critical view is that they also feed each other, and that communalism, organised crime, and cyber offence sit on the same file.
Body
How terrorism hinders internal security
- It kills and wounds, which is the first security failure, and it forces the State to spend on reaction rather than on schools and jobs that dry recruitment.
- It polarises communities so that a neighbourhood becomes a suspect list; intelligence then drowns in noise.
- Cross-border and homegrown cells use hawala, narcotics, and charities; terror finance is the quiet half of the attack.
- Over-broad response without due process can itself become a grievance factory — a critical cost of the UAPA–NIA toolkit if misused.
- Soft targets (markets, worship, transport) make daily life the battlefield; that is internal security hollowed, not only a border incident.
How corruption hinders internal security
- A bribed checkpoint, passport desk, or procurement officer is a hole in the fence: explosives, fake IDs, and substandard kit walk through.
- Police and intelligence that sell files cannot run a source; the citizen then fears the uniform more than the militant.
- Defence and police procurement scams leave troops with weak kit; that is security stolen before a shot.
- Welfare leakage does not look like a bomb, but it funds local toughs and hollows the State’s bargain with the poor.
- The Prevention of Corruption Act, Lokpal, CVC, and CBI are the legal answer; they fail when political protection is the real chain of command.
Critical link and limits
- Terror groups buy access; corrupt officials sell it. FATF-style money trails and a clean police are one war.
- The statement is still incomplete: Left-wing extremism, communal riots, cyber attacks, and organised crime also hinder internal security without always wearing a terror or bribe label.
- Treating every protest as terror, or every delay as corruption, weakens the word and the courts.
- Critical examination: both are real solvents of internal security. The cure is professional intelligence and a police that cannot be bought — plus politics that does not need either as a tool.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD T[Terrorism] --> V[Violence polarisation] C[Corruption] --> H[Sold checkpoint file kit] V --> I[Weaker internal security] H[H] --> I[I] F[Terror finance] --> T H[H] --> F[F] L[NIA UAPA PC Act] --> R[Repair if honest]
Conclusion
Terrorism hinders internal security by violence, polarisation, and terror finance; corruption hinders it by selling the checkpoint, the file, and the kit. They reinforce each other. NIA–UAPA and anti-corruption law are necessary; they are not enough if communal politics and a purchasable police remain. Other threats still sit on the same internal-security map.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the kinds and functions of civil defence. How much is it effective in Uttar Pradesh? Explain.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q19). View answer →
-
If corruption falls, does terrorism end?
No. Ideology, geopolitics, and local grievance remain. But a clean police makes terror cheaper to catch and harder to supply.
-
Is every hawala terrorism?
No. Hawala is informal finance. It becomes a security crime when it funds unlawful activity.
Same topic · past papers
UPPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2019 · Q2 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
Analyse corruption as a threat to internal security.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS3 · 8 marks · Solution
Discuss the Digital India Programme of India.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
Digital India (2015, MeitY) is the Union digital-governance and infrastructure programme. Nine pillars cover broadband, mobile, CSCs, e-Kranti, manufacturing, and jobs. BharatNet, CSC 2.0, and PMGDISHA are the last-mile connectivity and literacy rails. DigiLocker, UMANG, Aadhaar, UPI, and DBT carry documents, services, and payments. Hardware PLI and GSTN sit on the same stack; power and literacy still cap use.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS3 · 8 marks · Solution
Examine the impact of globalization on employment of formal sector of India.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
Post-1991 opening grew formal jobs in IT, ITeS, retail, banks, and some auto and SEZ plants. SEZ Act 2005 and Make in India named the park-and-investment rails. Contract labour and fixed-term hiring informalised much factory work even when the unit was registered. EPFO, ESIC, labour codes, and Atmanirbhar Bharat Rozgar Yojana are the social-security response. Net: more white-collar formality, weaker shop-floor security.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS3 · 8 marks · Solution
How does the strategy of inclusive growth intend to meet the objectives of inclusiveness and sustainability together? Explain.
Poverty, unemployment and inclusive growth
Inclusive growth shares output with the poor and lagging regions without exhausting nature. PMJDY, DBT, MGNREGA, DAY-NRLM, PMAY, and PM-KISAN are the equity rails. Ujjwala, Jal Jeevan Mission, Swachh Bharat, National Solar Mission, PM-KUSUM, and CAMPA are the green rails. NITI SDG India Index and Aspirational Districts score both together. The strategy works only if the same household gets income and a cleaner livelihood.