Revision summary
Wildlife conservation is limited by cut corridors, poaching, and human–animal conflict. WPA 1972, Project Tiger (NTCA), Project Elephant, and CAMPA are the named legal and fund rails. WCCB and CITES target trade; slow compensation still fuels revenge killing. Biological Diversity Act and the National Wildlife Action Plan ask for landscapes, not only fences. Climate and vacant staff make isolated parks islands unless corridors and local jobs are real.
Model answer
Introduction
Wildlife conservation in India sits on the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Project Tiger, and a network of parks and sanctuaries. The critical test is not the number of reserves on paper but habitat, corridors, and people who live next to animals.
Body
Habitat, crime, and conflict
- Highways, mining, and sprawl cut corridors, so tigers, elephants, and leopards become isolated and genetically weak.
- Poaching and illegal wildlife trade (CITES-listed species, skins, ivory, pangolin) still feed organised crime despite the Wildlife Crime Control Bureau.
- Crop-raiding and killings drive revenge poisoning; compensation under State rules is often slow, so the Forest Rights Act and village livelihood are part of conservation, not its enemy.
Policy capacity and climate
- Project Tiger (NTCA), Project Elephant, Project Snow Leopard, and CAMPA funds exist, but staff vacancies, fire, invasive weeds, and unplanned tourism hollow many parks.
- The Biological Diversity Act, 2002, and National Wildlife Action Plan ask for landscapes, not only fences; implementation is uneven across States.
- Climate shift moves ranges and dries waterholes; isolated protected areas cannot follow the animal unless corridors are legally held.
- A critical view therefore says law is strong, delivery is patchy: without corridors, honest compensation, and local jobs, a sanctuary becomes an island.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Habitat cut corridors] --> C[Conservation stress] P[Poaching wildlife trade] --> C F[Human-wildlife conflict] --> C C --> L[WPA 1972 NTCA Project Tiger] C --> M[CAMPA NWAP Biodiversity Act] L --> R[Landscape plus livelihood] M --> R
Conclusion
The challenge is fragmented habitat, trade, and conflict, not the absence of a statute. WPA 1972, NTCA, CAMPA, and biodiversity law work only if corridors and village livelihoods are funded as conservation.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
'Narco-Terrorism' is a threat to India's internal security. Discuss it.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Does declaring a sanctuary complete conservation?
No. Corridors, anti-poaching staff, and village compensation decide whether animals survive outside the core.
-
Is CAMPA the same as Project Tiger?
No. CAMPA is compensatory afforestation money. Project Tiger is a species-and-reserve programme under NTCA.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What do you understand by "leaving no one behind" with reference to sustainable development goals?
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
Leaving no one behind is the 2030 Agenda pledge to reach the poorest and most excluded first. Averages hide caste, gender, disability, and geography; disaggregated data are required. NITI Aayog’s SDG India Index and Aspirational Districts name lagging units. DBT, Aadhaar, and Jan Dhan try to put transfers in the beneficiary’s account. PM-JAY, POSHAN, PMAY, Samagra Shiksha, and MGNREGA are the large service rails.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
What are the objectives of NITI Aayog? Explain its three-years action plan.
Economic planning and NITI Aayog
NITI Aayog (2015) replaced the Planning Commission as a think tank, not a Plan-fund body. Objectives: cooperative federalism, SDG monitoring, innovation, and programme design. The Three-Year Action Agenda ran 2017–18 to 2019–20 under a 15-year vision and 7-year strategy. Priorities included jobs, farm income, infrastructure, inclusion, and governance. It was indicative; Union and State budgets still spend, while NITI tracks ranks and districts.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS3 · 8 marks
"Indian food processing industry has not grown with the pace of developed countries." Discuss it.
Food processing
India grows a lot of food but processes a smaller share than developed countries. Thin cold chain, uneven farm lots, slow Mega Food Parks, and compliance costs explain the lag. PMKSY (SAMPADA) funds parks, cold chain, and agro-processing clusters. Operation Greens and food-processing PLI target price crashes and branded scale. FSSAI, FPOs, and e-NAM help quality only when supply contracts exist.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.