Q16 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2024 · GS II · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 3 min read

← Q15 Q17 →

The labour class of the country has been significantly affected by the New Economic Policy. Explain.

Topic: Indian Constitution. Syllabus: Indian Constitution — historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Indian Constitution.

Revision summary

NEP 1991 liberalised trade and investment and reduced the public sector as lifetime employer. Organised factory and PSU jobs thinned through VRS, contracts, and import competition. Informalisation and contract labour became the mass experience of the labour class. Services, construction, and some export lines created work without old union security. MGNREGA and later DBT offered rural floors, not a substitute factory welfare state. Labour codes after 2019–20 try to simplify law; gig and unorganised cover remains the open end.

Model answer

Introduction

The New Economic Policy of 1991 opened trade, invited capital, and shrank the public sector’s role as the default employer. The labour class — factory workers, public-enterprise staff, farm labour spilling into cities, and later gig workers — was not a footnote to that shift. It was the class whose contracts, unions, and job security were rewritten.

Body

What NEP changed in the labour market

  • Liberalisation cut industrial licensing and opened imports; firms that had lived behind protection shed permanent rolls or closed, which hit organised manufacturing first.
  • Privatisation and disinvestment ended the assumption that a public-sector job was a lifetime welfare state for the industrial worker; VRS and freeze on recruitment thinned unionised employment.
  • Globalisation pulled India into export garments, gems, auto components, and IT-enabled services, which created work that was often contract, casual, or white-collar, not the old factory badge.

Adverse effects on the labour class

  • Informalisation is the central fact: more than nine-tenths of workers remain outside social security, and the organised factory’s share of total employment did not become a mass Fordist middle.
  • Contract labour and fixed-term hiring spread inside formal firms, so “organised sector” no longer meant secure labour; the Contract Labour Act was stretched rather than a new social contract.
  • Jobless or job-poor growth in some industrial phases meant GDP rose faster than decent jobs, which the labour class experienced as underemployment and rural return migration.
  • Trade unions lost density in many private plants; collective bargaining shrank to islands of public enterprises, banks, and a few large private houses.
  • Women in export factories and home-based work gained cash but not maternity, crèche, or equal supervision; vulnerability was gendered.
  • After 2015 the four labour codes promised simplification; critics in the labour class read easier hire-and-fire thresholds and a still-incomplete social-security net for gig and unorganised workers.

Gains that must sit in the same explanation

  • Services and construction absorbed millions, which is why absolute poverty could fall even while factory unions declined.
  • Real wages in some rural and construction markets rose with growth, MGNREGA (2005) as a rural floor, and later DBT; that is not the same as industrial security, but it is an effect on the same class.
  • A skilled minority in IT, logistics, and export manufacturing gained global wages; the labour class split rather than rose together.

Explanation in one line

  • NEP significantly affected labour by shrinking secure public and factory jobs, expanding informal and contract work, and offering uneven new employment in services — a structural, not accidental, outcome of LPG.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  NEP[NEP 1991 LPG] --> P[PSU thin and VRS]
  NEP --> I[Informal and contract labour]
  NEP --> S[Services and export jobs]
  I --> L[Labour class split]
  S --> L

Conclusion

The New Economic Policy reallocated work away from protected, unionised public manufacturing toward informal, contract, and service jobs. The labour class gained some employment and rural wage floors and lost much of the old security. That double movement is the significant effect the statement names.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • What is India's progress on hunger and poverty after 2014? Explain.

    Next question in the 2024 paper (Q17). View answer →

  • Did NEP only hurt labour?

    No. It hurt secure organised jobs and expanded informal work, but it also grew services and some real wages. The effect is significant because it split the class.

  • Are the four labour codes the same as NEP 1991?

    No. They are a later simplification of labour law. Critics still read them as completing the flexibility logic that 1991 began.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Write a short note on the composition of the Constituent Assembly.

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q4 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    How does the Indian Constitution ensure the independence of the judiciary? Discuss the importance of the basic structure doctrine.

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q5 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Review the contribution of the public distribution system in poverty alleviation.

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q13 · UPGS2 · 12 marks

    How does the Indian Constitution compare with other modern constitutions in terms of flexibility and rigidity?

    View answer →

  5. 2024 · Q17 · UPGS2 · 12 marks

    What is India's progress on hunger and poverty after 2014? Explain.

    View answer →

  6. 2023 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Why the Preamble is called the Philosophy of the Indian Constitution?

    View answer →

  7. 2023 · Q2 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Why the 42nd Amendment is called a revision of the Indian Constitution?

    View answer →

  8. 2023 · Q3 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Mention three demerits of Judicial Activism.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Write a short note on the composition of the Constituent Assembly.

Indian Constitution

The Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946, designed an indirectly elected Constituent Assembly. Provincial assemblies chose 296 British-India seats by STV; princely states nominated 93. Original strength 389 fell to 299 after Partition. Dr Rajendra Prasad presided; Dr Ambedkar chaired the Drafting Committee. That elite college still claimed popular authority through the Objective Resolution.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Write the role of NITI Aayog in the development of India.

Government policies for development

NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission on 1 January 2015 as a Union think tank. The Prime Minister chairs it; Chief Ministers sit on the Governing Council. It does not allocate Plan funds; the Budget and Finance Commission do fiscal federalism. Aspirational Districts, SDG India Index, and Atal Innovation Mission are its main development tools. Impact depends on State and ministry action, not on a NITI cheque.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

What are the special legislative powers of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha)? Discuss.

Union and the States

Article 249 lets Rajya Sabha by a two-thirds resolution authorise Parliament to legislate on a State List matter in the national interest. Article 312 uses the same two-thirds key for new All-India Services. If Lok Sabha is dissolved, Rajya Sabha can still approve emergency proclamations. On Money Bills Rajya Sabha only recommends for fourteen days under Article 109. Special powers are federal keys, not a general supremacy over Lok Sabha.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.