Q18 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2018 · GS II · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q17 Q19 →

Examine Right to Equality as a Fundamental Right in the Constitution of India.

Topic: Indian Constitution. Syllabus: Indian Constitution — historical underpinnings, evolution, features, amendments, significant provisions and basic structure. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2018 and Indian Constitution.

Revision summary

Equality in the Constitution is Articles 14 to 18, not Article 14 alone. Article 14 bars class legislation but allows reasonable classification with nexus. Articles 15 and 16 ban listed discrimination and still permit affirmative reservation. Article 17 abolishes untouchability; Article 18 bans titles as republican equality. Reservations and anti-arbitrariness are part of the right, not optional politics beside it.

Model answer

Introduction

  • Right to Equality in Part III is a cluster, not a single sentence: Articles 14 to 18 bind the State to equal protection, non-discrimination, equal opportunity in public employment, abolition of untouchability, and a ban on titles. Examination must show both the formal rule and the Constitution’s own exceptions for backwardness and affirmative action.

Body

Article 14

  • Article 14 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws to any person, including many non-citizens, against the State.
  • Equality before the law is the English rule against privilege; equal protection is the American idea that likes must be treated alike.
  • The Supreme Court allows reasonable classification if it rests on an intelligible differentia and a rational nexus to the object of the law; class legislation is void, classification is not.
  • Arbitrariness itself can fail Article 14 after Royappa and Maneka; the article is therefore both anti-privilege and anti-caprice.

Articles 15 and 16

  • Article 15 bars State discrimination on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth, with clauses that permit special provisions for women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and later economically weaker sections.
  • Article 16 guarantees equality of opportunity in public employment and permits reservation in appointments for backward classes not adequately represented, plus consequential seniority and other designed clauses after amendments.
  • Indra Sawhney treated 50 per cent as a general ceiling with extraordinary exceptions; the 103rd Amendment added EWS reservation, later upheld in Janhit Abhiyan with a divided Court.

Articles 17 and 18

  • Article 17 abolishes untouchability and makes its practice an offence; it is among the few Fundamental Rights that also bind private individuals in a direct way.
  • Article 18 forbids the State from conferring titles (except military and academic distinctions) and bars citizens from foreign titles without consent—equality as republican dignity, not only as a court test.

Limits and living equality

  • Reasonable restrictions, national security, and the basic-structure protection of equality after Kesavananda mean Parliament can amend details but not hollow the principle.
  • Living equality also needs Articles 15–16 to work in universities and services, and Article 17 to work in villages; a beautifully classified statute that never reaches a Dalit child is not the Right the framers wrote.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  E[Right to Equality] --> A14[Art 14 equal protection]
  E --> A15[Art 15 non-discrimination]
  E --> A16[Art 16 public employment]
  E --> A17[Art 17 untouchability]
  E --> A18[Art 18 titles]
  A14 --> C[Reasonable classification]
  A15 --> R[Reservations SEBC SC ST EWS]
  A16 --> R

Conclusion

  • Right to Equality is Articles 14–18 read together: formal equal protection, anti-discrimination, public-employment fairness, abolition of untouchability, and a republican ban on titles. Examination is incomplete unless reasonable classification and reservation are seen as constitutional tools of equality, not as its betrayal.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Write a short note on the emergence and use of alternative dispute redressal mechanisms in India.

    Next question in the 2018 paper (Q19). View answer →

  • Does Article 14 apply only to citizens?

    No. It speaks of any person. Articles 15 and 16 are largely citizen-centred in their discrimination and public-employment clauses.

  • Are reservations a breach of equality?

    The Constitution treats certain reservations as a means of equal protection. The judicial debate is about extent, creamy layer, and ceiling—not about whether any reservation is automatically unconstitutional.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2019 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Describe the objectives and impact of Atal-Bhujal Yojana.

    View answer →

  2. 2018 · Q1 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Why is India opposed to mediation on Kashmir?

    View answer →

  3. 2018 · Q6 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Write a short note on the contribution of the Indian diaspora towards the economic structure in India.

    View answer →

  4. 2018 · Q8 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Describe those special powers of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) which are not enjoyed by the Lok Sabha under the Indian Constitution.

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q10 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Examine the constitutional position of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q11 · UPGS2 · 12 marks

    How will the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan affect India? Comment.

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q15 · UPGS2 · 12 marks

    What are the main issues related to poverty and hunger?

    View answer →

  8. 2018 · Q17 · UPGS2 · 12 marks

    In the monsoon session of the Indian Parliament in 2019, Amendments were made in the anti-terror law and the Right to Information Act. What are the significant changes as a result of these Amendments? Analyse.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Why is India opposed to mediation on Kashmir?

Indian Constitution

India treats Jammu and Kashmir as an integral Union subject after accession in 1947. Simla 1972 and later bilateral texts require peaceful settlement without a mediator. Mediation would internationalise what New Delhi now frames as an internal constitutional and security issue. Pakistan is a counterpart for talks on terror and peace, not a co-sovereign over Indian territory. India therefore rejects UN, great-power, or other good-offices formulas that write a Kashmir settlement.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Critically examine the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.

India and its neighbours

The ICJ is the UN’s principal judicial organ under the Charter and the ICJ Statute. Contentious cases lie only between states and only with consent via special agreement, treaty, or optional clause. The Court rules on its own jurisdiction, as in Jadhav under the consular Optional Protocol. Advisory opinions go to authorised UN organs and are not binding judgments. Enforcement depends on states and the Security Council; individuals are not on trial at the ICJ.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Throw light on the challenges and problems of farmers and the agriculture sector in Uttar Pradesh. Suggest measures for improvement.

Social sector services

Uttar Pradesh leads in foodgrain output but farm incomes stay low on tiny holdings and uneven water. Eastern floods and Bundelkhand droughts sit beside western groundwater stress and cane-payment delays. Paddy–wheat lock-in and thin mandi–FPO reach keep farmers as price-takers. Remedies are last-mile irrigation, statutory cane dues, FPO and e-NAM markets, and a shift to pulses, millets, milk, and processing. Land-lease clarity and working crop insurance must travel with those measures.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.