Revision summary
The 2019 monsoon session amended UAPA and the RTI Act. UAPA now allows the Union to designate individuals, not only organisations, as terrorists. NIA investigation powers in this field were strengthened. RTI no longer hard-wires a five-year CIC term and Election-Commissioner-like salary. The Centre prescribes tenure and pay, raising independence concerns about the information watchdog.
Model answer
Introduction
In the 2019 monsoon session Parliament passed the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act and the Right to Information (Amendment) Act. Analysis must name the operational changes—who may be listed as a terrorist, who investigates, who fixes the Information Commissioners’ term and pay—and then the federal and rights costs of those changes.
Body
UAPA Amendment Act, 2019
- The parent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, already provided for organisations to be listed as terrorist organisations; the 2019 amendment allows the Union to designate individuals as terrorists as well.
- An individual so designated faces a specific legal stigma and asset-freeze logic even without a completed trial, which the government defends as matching UN listing practice and as closing a gap where a person left a banned group and continued violence.
- The National Investigation Agency’s reach was widened to investigate such cases with less dependence on State police as the first mover.
- Critics argue that executive designation without adequate prior judicial filter chills dissent, duplicates ordinary criminal law, and is hard to reverse in practice.
RTI Amendment Act, 2019
- The RTI Act, 2005, had fixed the Central Information Commissioner’s term at five years (or until 65) and aligned salary with the Election Commissioner, a design meant to copy institutional independence.
- The 2019 amendment empowers the Central Government to prescribe tenure, salary, allowances, and other service conditions for the CIC and Information Commissioners at the Centre, and correspondingly influences the State Information Commission pattern through Central prescription.
- The official claim was flexibility and the need not to equate Information Commissions with constitutional election machinery.
- The rights claim is that a government that is the largest RTI respondent now writes the Commissioners’ terms, weakening the appearance of an independent information watchdog.
Joint significance
- One session therefore tightened the security State’s listing power and loosened statutory insulation of the transparency State.
- Significant change is not only text: UAPA designation can travel into bail, passport, and employment life; RTI change can travel into how boldly a Commission orders disclosure against the same executive.
- Courts, parliamentary opposition, and civil society remain the residual checks; the amendments themselves moved both statutes toward greater Union executive room.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Monsoon session 2019] --> U[UAPA Amendment] M --> R[RTI Amendment] U --> I[Individual terrorist listing] U --> N[Wider NIA role] R --> T[Centre fixes CIC tenure pay]
Conclusion
The 2019 UAPA change that matters is individual terrorist designation plus a stronger NIA role; the RTI change that matters is Central control of Information Commissioners’ tenure and pay. Together they enlarge executive discretion in security and shrink the statutory halo of the transparency watchdog—gains against organised terror must still be weighed against dissent and disclosure risks.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine Right to Equality as a Fundamental Right in the Constitution of India.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q18). View answer →
-
Did the 2019 UAPA amendment create India’s first anti-terror law?
No. UAPA already existed, as did TADA and POTA in earlier decades. 2019’s significant change is individual listing on top of organisation listing.
-
Did the RTI amendment abolish the Information Commission?
No. Commissions remain. What changed is who sets their term and salary—now the Central Government by rules, not the 2005 Act’s EC-style freeze.
Same topic · past papers
UPPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2022 · Q13 · UPGS2 · 12 marks
Explain the objectives and composition of “NITI Aayog”. What are its significant achievements?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks · Solution
Why is India opposed to mediation on Kashmir?
Indian Constitution
India treats Jammu and Kashmir as an integral Union subject after accession in 1947. Simla 1972 and later bilateral texts require peaceful settlement without a mediator. Mediation would internationalise what New Delhi now frames as an internal constitutional and security issue. Pakistan is a counterpart for talks on terror and peace, not a co-sovereign over Indian territory. India therefore rejects UN, great-power, or other good-offices formulas that write a Kashmir settlement.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks · Solution
Critically examine the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
India and its neighbours
The ICJ is the UN’s principal judicial organ under the Charter and the ICJ Statute. Contentious cases lie only between states and only with consent via special agreement, treaty, or optional clause. The Court rules on its own jurisdiction, as in Jadhav under the consular Optional Protocol. Advisory opinions go to authorised UN organs and are not binding judgments. Enforcement depends on states and the Security Council; individuals are not on trial at the ICJ.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS2 · 8 marks · Solution
Throw light on the challenges and problems of farmers and the agriculture sector in Uttar Pradesh. Suggest measures for improvement.
Social sector services
Uttar Pradesh leads in foodgrain output but farm incomes stay low on tiny holdings and uneven water. Eastern floods and Bundelkhand droughts sit beside western groundwater stress and cane-payment delays. Paddy–wheat lock-in and thin mandi–FPO reach keep farmers as price-takers. Remedies are last-mile irrigation, statutory cane dues, FPO and e-NAM markets, and a shift to pulses, millets, milk, and processing. Land-lease clarity and working crop insurance must travel with those measures.