Q14 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2020 · GS I · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q13 Q15 →

Critically examine the concept of nation and citizenship in context of communalism.

Topic: Social empowerment, communalism, regionalism and secularism. Syllabus: Social empowerment, communalism, regionalism and secularism. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Social empowerment, communalism, regionalism and secularism.

Revision summary

A nation is an imagined civic community; communalism makes religion the political ‘we’. Separate electorates and two-nation theory trained colonial subjects to vote as communities. Citizenship should be equal law; communal politics grades rights by group. Riots and sacred geography turn streets into communal property. Constitutional secularism is the civic answer; majoritarianism is the living threat.

Model answer

Introduction

A nation is a political community of imagined equals; citizenship is the legal membership that should carry equal rights and duties. Communalism treats religion as the primary political identity, and a sociological examination asks how that claim fractures both nation and citizen.

Body

Nation versus communal belonging

  • Sociology treats the modern nation as an abstract fellowship of strangers (print, school, census), not as a congregation; communalism re-sacralises politics by making the religious group the real ‘we’.
  • Communal ideology selects a golden past, a threatening other, and a demand that the state privilege one community, which is the opposite of a civic nation of equal strangers.
  • In colonial India, separate electorates (1909 onward) and the two-nation argument trained people to vote as Hindus or Muslims rather than as citizens of one territorial public.
  • Partition showed the extreme: when nation is defined as a religious majority’s home, minorities become guests or enemies, and citizenship becomes graded.

Citizenship under communal pressure

  • Civic citizenship is jus soli plus equal law: one person, one vote, one criminal code in the public sphere.
  • Communal politics demands personal law as group sovereignty, jobs and constituencies as community quotas of power, and sometimes a religious test of loyalty.
  • Riot, rumour, and sacred geography (mosque, temple, procession routes) turn neighbourhoods into communal property, so the street is no longer a civic space.
  • Women and Dalits inside each community are often spoken for by male elites; communal ‘protection’ can shrink their independent citizenship.

Critical balance

  • A republic that only preaches unity without minority security will look like majoritarian nationhood; a politics that only defends community walls will never grow a shared citizen.
  • Indian constitutional secularism tries to keep nation territorial and citizenship equal, while still allowing religious freedom; communalism is the sociological name for the force that pulls both back toward ascriptive rank.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  N[Civic nation] --> C[Equal citizenship]
  K[Communalism] --> N
  K[K] --> C[C]
  K --> P[Graded belonging riot]

Conclusion

In the context of communalism, nation shrinks from civic fellowship to religious majority, and citizenship from equal membership to graded community right. The examination is critical when it names colonial separate electorates and still-living majoritarian pressure on the republic.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • What is Liberalization? How is it affecting the Indian social structure?

    Next question in the 2020 paper (Q15). View answer →

  • Is religious identity itself communalism?

    No. Faith and worship can exist with civic citizenship. Communalism begins when religion is organised as a political army against another group.

  • Does minority protection contradict the nation?

    Equal citizenship requires protection of minorities. That is civic nationhood. Privilege for a majority religion is communal nationhood.

Same topic · past papers

UPPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2024 · Q18 · UPGS1 · 12 marks

    Throw light on the concept of smart village in India and describe the main features of smart village.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS1 · 8 marks · Solution

Write a note on the town planning of Harappan civilization period.

History of Indian Culture

Mature Harappan cities used an orthogonal street plan and standardised baked brick. A citadel or raised platform and a lower town organised civic space. Covered street drains, house baths, and wells are the core of water planning. The Great Bath, warehouse blocks, Lothal’s basin, and Dholavira’s reservoirs are public works. Planning varies by site and does not require a palace or great temple to be urban.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS1 · 8 marks · Solution

Evaluate the views of Gandhi on the Varna system.

Freedom struggle

Gandhi treated varna as four duties, not as ranked jati or untouchability. He called untouchability a sin and organised the Harijan Sevak Sangh after 1932. Temple entry and the Poona Pact were his political field; Ambedkar still rejected birth-varna. Later Gandhi accepted inter-caste marriage and attacked caste hierarchy more sharply. The ethical gain is real; the structural limit is that hereditary calling can freeze labour.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · UPGS1 · 8 marks · Solution

Write a critical note on the Foreign Policy of Mussolini, the leader of Fascism in Italy.

History of Indian Culture

Fascist foreign policy sought Mediterranean empire and revision of 1919. Corfu 1923 and Locarno 1925 show early mix of bullying and conservative diplomacy. Ethiopia 1935–36 and League sanctions turned Italy toward Nazi Germany. The Axis, Anti-Comintern Pact, Albania 1939, and Pact of Steel bound Rome to Berlin. War in 1940 exposed weak means; Italy became a junior partner and the regime fell in 1943.

PDF