Q7 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2019 · Essay · 50 marks · ~700 words in the hall · 1 min read

← Q6 Q8 →

Changing paradigm of Indian foreign policy.

Topic: National and international events. Syllabus: Section C — National and International Events; Natural Calamities; National Development programmes and projects. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2019 and National and international events.

Essay map

Opening scene

Anecdote

An old NAM family photo and a later table with more flags. Indian foreign policy did not become someone else’s camp overnight. The paradigm is a thicker toolbox. Write what changed: China, a diaspora, a energy, a Quad-era talk — without a party. The paradigm shifted in tools: more tables, a navy, a diaspora. The refusal to be a camp-follower is the constant.

Keep this in every paragraph

One stand

  • Paradigm: from moral voice-plus-nonalignment to interest-plus-multi. Neighbourhood, a Indo-Pacific word, a Russia thread.

Turn each heading into a full paragraph in the hall

Heading map

What the line is asking

  • Changing: name two shifts. Indian: continuity of strategic autonomy.

Shifts

  • Economy as diplomacy. Minilaterals. A harder China file.

Continuity

  • UN, a developing-world claim, a diaspora care.

The counter

Every CM visit is not a new doctrine. Media ‘resets’ are not paradigms.

Tools, same spine

  • From moral speech to capacity — vaccines, a rail, a ship.
  • Multi-alignment is a method for a crowded room.
  • Neighbourhood remains the hardest table.
  • Sitting everywhere without an ethic is standing for nothing.

Drop one peg where it fits — not a data dump

Value addition

  • NAM / Panchsheel The old grammar.
  • Look East / Indo-Pacific A named shift — one will do.
  • Quad / BRICS Toolkit, not a purity test.
  • Neighbourhood first A doctrine-cousin — test on one case.
  • UNGA Continuity of a voice.

Last 8–10 lines in the exam

Last paragraph

Indian foreign policy changed its instruments, not its need for a spine. More tables, a louder diaspora, a ship in a strait — these are a new paradigm of capacity. The old paradigm of not joining another’s war still explains why a republic bargains. Write continuity of autonomy and change of tools. A neighbourhood crisis will still fail a distant speech. Multipolar cleverness that cannot name a human cost is only cleverness. Close on more tools and the same refusal to be a camp-follower. That is a changing paradigm that can still be told as a republic’s story.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Resource management in India.

    Next question in the 2019 paper (Q8). View answer →

  • Full 700-word essay?

    No. Map only. In the hall, grow each heading; write in English or Hindi, not both.

  • Tone?

    IR, cool. Two shifts, one continuity. Not a manifesto.

Same topic · past papers

UPPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2025 · Q5 · UPESS · 50 marks

    The issue of ethics in a changing global economy.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPESS · 50 marks · Solution

Literature and Moral Values.

Literature, culture, society and polity

Map. A well named in class. Stand: literature trains an ought; police kills it. Peg Premchand. Counter: not a catechism.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2019 · UPESS · 50 marks · Solution

One Nation, one Constitution.

Literature, culture, society and polity

Map. Same Preamble in a far booth. Stand: civic unity, not flattening. Peg basic structure. Counter: custom as fake diversity.

PDF