Correct answer: (a) 2 and 3 only
Explanation
- A
2 and 3 only
2 and 3 only. Statement 2 is correct because the Summary Revenue Settlement of 1856 was based on the assumption that the taluqdars were interlopers who had established their hold over the land through force and fraud. Statement 3 is correct because British policy aimed to bypass the taluqdars and settle revenue directly with the actual cultivators, believing this would protect peasants and increase state revenue.
- B
1 and 3 only
Statement 1 claims that the taluqdars were allowed to retain their arms and forts, which is incorrect. As part of the pacification and disarmament of Awadh, the British dismantled thousands of taluqdars' forts and confiscated their weapons, making this option wrong.
- C
1, 2 and 3
This option includes statement 1, which is incorrect because the British systematically disarmed the taluqdars and destroyed their mud forts.
- D
2 only
This option is incomplete because while statement 2 is correct, statement 3 is also correct as part of the core British land revenue policy in newly annexed Awadh. Summary. Official key is (a). The British annexation of Awadh in 1856 led to the Summary Revenue Settlement, which treated taluqdars as intruders and sought to settle revenue directly with the cultivators, thereby undermining traditional authority structures. Statement 1 is incorrect because taluqdars were disarmed and their forts were dismantled.
Summary. Official key is (a). The British annexation of Awadh in 1856 led to the Summary Revenue Settlement, which treated taluqdars as intruders and sought to settle revenue directly with the cultivators, thereby undermining traditional authority structures. Statement 1 is incorrect because taluqdars were disarmed and their forts were dismantled.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.