Correct answer: (c) Both 1 and 2
Explanation
- A
1 only
Claims statement 1 alone is correct. This is incorrect because Pali literary references to early Indian coinage and punch-marked silver coins directly reflect both the emergence of urban centres and the concurrent monetization of trade, making statement 2 equally valid.
- B
2 only
Claims statement 2 alone is correct. This is incorrect because the textual mention of coin types like kahapana and nikkha in Pali literature is also a primary marker for the growth of urban life and trade networks, making statement 1 correct.
- C
Both 1 and 2
Both 1 and 2. Pali texts provide early definitive references to currency denominations such as kahapana, nikkha, kamsa, and kakanika, while archaeological excavations corroborate this with widespread punch-marked silver coins, reflecting both urban expansion and the transition to a money economy during the Northern Black Polished Ware (NBPW) phase.
- D
Neither 1 nor 2
Claims neither statement is correct. This is incorrect because both the literary evidence of currency in Pali texts and the archaeological discovery of silver punch-marked coins are historically well-established markers for early Indian urbanization and monetization. Summary. Official key is (c). The combination of Pali literary references to early Indian coin denominations and archaeological findings of silver punch-marked coins reliably indicates both the emergence of urban life and the transition to a money economy in ancient India.
Summary. Official key is (c). The combination of Pali literary references to early Indian coin denominations and archaeological findings of silver punch-marked coins reliably indicates both the emergence of urban life and the transition to a money economy in ancient India.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.