Correct answer: (c) 1 and 3 only
Explanation
- A
1 and 2 only
1 and 2 only claims that statements 1 and 2 support the given propositions. While statement 1 is correct regarding the Rigvedic terminology for drawing water, statement 2 refers to agricultural implements like axes and sickles which do not specifically explain irrigation from wells or draught-animal power used for water lifting, making this option incorrect.
- B
1, 2 and 3
1, 2 and 3 claims all three statements support the propositions. Since statement 2 details general agricultural tools rather than well irrigation or animal-powered water lifting mechanisms, this comprehensive combination is rendered incorrect.
- C
1 and 3 only
1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is supported by Rigvedic references to ashma chakra (stone pulley wheel) and ahava (strapped wooden pails) used for drawing water. Statement 3 is supported by the historical continuity of utilizing oxen for pulling carts and ploughing the land, which aligns with draught-animal power applications. Hence, both statements directly support the given propositions.
- D
3 only
3 only claims that only statement 3 supports the propositions. This ignores statement 1, which provides direct textual evidence from the Rigveda regarding well-irrigation implements like the stone pulley wheel, making this option incomplete and incorrect.
Summary. Official key is (c). The question examines material life and technology in the Rigvedic period, supported by textual evidence of well-irrigation devices like the stone pulley and the continuous use of draught animals for agricultural operations, while excluding unrelated tools like general axes and sickles from the irrigation mechanism proof.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.