Explanation
- A
Only one
Only one. Two of the three Parliament statements hold.
- B
Only two
Only two. Rajya Sabha may only recommend on a Money Bill. Joint sitting is not available for a Money Bill; ‘necessary for Finance Bill’ over-claims, so not all three.
- C
All three
All three. A Finance Bill that is a Money Bill cannot be rejected by Rajya Sabha, so statement 1 is not always true.
- D
None
None. Money-Bill procedure in statement 2 is standard Article 109.
Summary. Official key is (b) only two. On a Money Bill the Rajya Sabha can only recommend (Article 109). There is no joint sitting for a Money Bill. A Finance Bill is not always a Money Bill; Rajya Sabha’s power and joint sitting depend on certification — so not every limb in 1 and 3 is clean. The paper keys two correct statements.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2024 · Q68 · General Studies · 2 marks
Which of the following statements are correct in respect of a Money Bill in the Parliament? 1. Article 109 mentions special procedure in respect of Money Bills. 2. A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States. 3. The Rajya Sabha can either approve the Bill or suggest changes but cannot reject it. 4. Amendment to a Money Bill suggested by the Rajya Sabha have to be accepted by the Lok Sabha. Select the correct answer using the code given below : -
2015 · Q27 · General Studies · 2 marks
Consider the following statements: 1. The Rajya Sabha has no power either to reject or to amend a Money Bill. 2. The Rajya Sabha cannot vote on the Demands for Grants. 3. The Rajya Sabha cannot discuss the Annual Financial Statement. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? -
2024 · Q94 · General Studies · 2 marks
With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution. 2. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. 3. A bill in regard to which the President of India notified his/her intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ? -
2022 · Q13 · General Studies · 2 marks
Consider the following statements: 1. A bill amending the Constitution requires a prior recommendation of the President of India. 2. When a Constitution Amendment Bill is presented to the President of India, it is obligatory for the President of India to give his/her assent. 3. A Constitution Amendment Bill must be passed by both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha by a special majority and there is no provision for joint sitting. Which of the statements given above are correct? -
2015 · Q37 · General Studies · 2 marks
When a bill is referred to a joint sitting of both the Houses of the Parliament, it has to be passed by