Explanation
- A
1 and 2
(a) 1 and 2. Statement 2 is right, but statement 1 is not: NFSA covers priority households and Antyodaya, identified by States, not only official BPL lists. Pairing them is not the key.
- B
2 only
(b) 2 only. (b) Official key: For ration cards the eldest woman aged 18 or above is the household head. Statement 1 wrongly confines the Act to BPL. Statement 3’s 1600-calorie take-home ration is not the NFSA entitlement (the Act provides meals and a maternity benefit of at least Rs 6,000). Only statement 2 is correct.
- C
1 and 3
(c) 1 and 3. Both of those statements are wrong, so this is not the key.
- D
3 only
(d) 3 only. The 1600-calorie claim misstates NFSA. This is not the key.
Summary. Official key is (b) 2 only. NFSA 2013 names the eldest adult woman as ration-card head. Coverage is priority plus AAY, not BPL-only. Maternity support is meals and a cash benefit, not a 1600-calorie statutory ration. Honour the stored letter (b).
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.