Q2 · UPSC Prelims 2017 · Set A · Art and Culture

← Q1 Q3 →

With reference to the difference between the culture of Rigvedic Aryans and Indus Valley people, which of the following statements is/are correct?1.Rigvedic Aryans used the coat of mail and helmet in warfare whereas the people of Indus Valley Civilization did not leave any evidence of using them.2.Rigvedic Aryans knew gold, silver and copper whereas Indus Valley people knew only copper and iron.3.Rigvedic Aryans had domesticated the horse whereas there is no evidence of Indus Valley people having been aware of this animal.Select the correct answer using the code given below:

A 1 only
B 2 and 3 only
C 1 and 3 only
D 1, 2 and 3

Correct answer: (c) 1 and 3 only

Explanation

  1. A

    1 only

    (a) 1 only. Statement 1 is right — Rigvedic warriors used mail and helmet, while Harappan remains do not show that panoply — but statement 3 on the horse is also accepted, so 1 only is incomplete.

  2. B

    2 and 3 only

    (b) 2 and 3 only. Statement 2 is false: Indus people knew gold, silver and copper (and bronze), not iron, and Rigvedic Aryans were not limited to those three metals in the way the statement frames the contrast. So 2 and 3 only is not the key.

  3. C

    1 and 3 only

    (c) 1 and 3 only. Coat of mail and helmet appear in Rigvedic warfare and not in Indus armour finds, while the domesticated horse is Rigvedic and lacks clear Indus evidence. Statement 2 fails on iron and on the metal list, so this pairing is the official key.

  4. D

    1, 2 and 3

    (d) 1, 2 and 3. Including statement 2 is fatal because the Indus corpus is a copper–bronze culture with gold and silver, not an iron-using one. All three is not the key.

Summary. Official key is (c) 1 and 3 only. Rigvedic hymns and later Vedic equipment point to mail and helmets in war; Harappan sites have not yielded comparable armour. The horse is central to Rigvedic life, whereas Indus evidence for that animal remains unconvincing. Statement 2 reverses the metallurgy: Indus people used gold, silver and copper/bronze and did not know iron. Hence only 1 and 3 stand.

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2026 · Q10 · General Studies · 2 marks

    Consider the following statements about the Rigvedic period: I. Irrigation from wells allowed agriculture to expand away from flood plains and strips on river margins into the present Punjab and Haryana plains having underground water levels reasonably close to the surface. II. Draught-animal power was employed to draw up water out of the wells. Which of the following information support/supports the above statements? 1. There is evidence in the Rigveda of the use of ashma chakra (stone pulley wheel) and ahava (strapped wooden pails) to draw up water. 2. Mention has been made in the Rigveda of the use of implements like parashu/kulisha (axe) and datra/sreni (sickle). 3. There is a history of the use of ox, even before the Rigveda, for ploughing the land and pulling the carts

    View answer →

PDF