Revision summary
Sustainable development is possible in India only if growth is decoupled from dumping costs on the poor. Main issues are climate risk, air and water stress, forest loss, land conversion and inequality. Guha–Gadgil’s sociology of ecosystem people versus omnivores still explains who suffers. Measures include just energy transition, FRA, crop and city reform, and SDG-consistent budgets. Possibility is a political path, not a technical guarantee.
Model answer
Introduction
Sustainable development is possible in India, not as a green slogan and not as a freeze on the poor. It is possible as a politically enforced path: lower carbon and pollution intensity, restored commons, and a fairer share of ecological space. The obstacles are structural—coal-and-car growth, caste-class dumping of waste, and a development state that still treats nature as a free input.
Body
Major issues
- Climate: monsoon instability, heat, Himalayan water towers, and coastal risk. Air: Indo-Gangetic winter smog as a class-blind killer that still hits outdoor labour first. Water: groundwater mining in Green Revolution belts, polluted rivers, and peri-urban tanker mafias. Forests and biodiversity: mining and linear projects versus FRA and Gram Sabha. Land: conversion of cultivating fields (Q5a) and displacement. Inequality: the rich consume; the poor live beside the dump, the mine, and the floodplain. Energy: coal lock-in versus renewable jobs that may not go to the same districts.
- Sociology adds: environmentalism of the poor (Guha, Gadgil’s omnivores vs ecosystem people), urban middle-class beautification that evicts, and caste in sanitation work. Chipko, Narmada, and Niyamgiri are not “green extras”; they are conflicts over who owns the future of a river or a hill.
Measures
A just energy transition with retraining in coal belts; crop diversification and procurement that does not mandate paddy where aquifers die; public transport and compact cities against exclusionary sprawl; genuine FRA and PESA; enforcement against industrial effluent; SDG-aligned budgets that treat Goal 13 and Goal 10 together; and making the polluter—not the ragpicker—pay. NEP and skill policy should include green trades without romanticising unpaid Adivasi conservation. Heat action plans, urban forests, and crop insurance are adaptation; they fail if they ignore informal outdoor labour.
- Possibility is empirical: India already runs a huge renewable programme and a huge coal programme. Sustainability is the political choice to stop using the poor as the sink. Yogendra Singh’s modernity without ecological accounting is incomplete; Desai’s development path must now count carbon and caste together. SDG reporting without Gram Sabha consent is green letterhead, not a lived village commons.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ISS[Climate air water forest inequality] --> POL[Political choice] POL --> YES[Conditional sustainability] M[Just transition FRA compact cities] --> YES
Conclusion
Yes, India can develop sustainably if ecological costs stop being assigned by caste and class. The issues are climate, air, water, forest and inequality. The measures are just transition, commons rights, and cities that do not export harm to the edge.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Do you think that forced displacement of labourers has caused their deprivation and resultant inequalities during the recent past years? Elaborate
Next question in the 2025 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Does sustainability mean no industry?
No. It means industry that does not treat Adivasi land and urban air as free sewers, plus public transport and clean power.
-
Are SDGs enough?
They are a dashboard. Without conflict over land and energy, the dashboard stays a report.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Which measures would you suggest for preventing caste conflicts in India ? Justify your argument -
2025 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Do you think that forced displacement of labourers has caused their deprivation and resultant inequalities during the recent past years? Elaborate -
2024 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is sustainable development? How can sustainability be achieved in India where livelihood needs conflict with environmental protection? -
2024 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
To what extent have the legal provisions been effective in curbing violence against women in India? Give your argument -
2023 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Citing some case studies, expand the concept of Development-induced Displacement? -
2022 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Instead of promoting equality in society , the present system of education itself has contributed to increased socio economic disparities" Comment . -
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the New Education Policy, 2020 aim to eradicate disparities in the system of education in India? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on Ghurye's conception of caste in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
'Textual perspective is important in understanding of Indian Social System.' Discuss.
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
The textual perspective explains Indian society through Dharmashastra, epics and related canons. Ghurye and Dumont used that archive to theorise caste as a hierarchical whole. The approach is strong on civilisational categories and weak on labour, gender and local power. Srinivas’s field view and Desai’s Marxism correct the book without discarding it. Texts remain part of the social system because groups still quote them in law and ritual.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Justify that the Indian traditions are modernizing. Also discuss its contributing factors.
Perspectives on the study of Indian society
Yogendra Singh treats modernization of Indian tradition as internal and external change together. Sanskritization, westernization and the Rudolphs’ modernity of tradition describe recasting, not simple death. Law, education, media, the developmental state and the post-1991 market are the main levers. Caste, household and religion persist in new organisational forms. Unevenness remains: mobility in class can coexist with control in marriage.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
According to you, which social reform movement has played the most effective role in uplifting the status of women? Explain.
Social Movements in Modern India
The most effective women’s social reform is the Phule–Ambedkar anti-caste line, not only bhadralok campaigns. It tied girls’ education, a critique of endogamy, and constitutional legal personhood. Sati abolition and widow remarriage opened the public question but had a narrower class-caste base. Hindu Code, later feminist litigation and Shah Bano debates inherit that citizenship frame. Patriarchy continues; effectiveness means a changed legal and educational grammar, not a finished utopia.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.