Revision summary
Ghurye listed caste’s structural features from texts and history. He rejected a simple racial theory of caste. Tribe was often a backward Hindu in his integration thesis. Field sociologists showed living power that books do not fix. Class and Adivasi politics limit his civilisational whole.
Model answer
Introduction
G. S. Ghurye conceived caste as a historical Hindu structure with listed features, not as a mere racial leftover. His Indology made caste the spine of Indian society.
Body
Features and history
- He listed segmental division, hierarchy, restrictions on feeding and marriage, civil and religious disabilities, and lack of unrestricted occupation.
- Caste and Race in India rejected a crude racial theory, yet kept Aryan and Brahmanical organisation as historical keys.
- Endogamy and commensal rules make caste a closed reproduction of groups.
Society, tribe, and nation
- For Ghurye, caste is civilisational: Hindu society is a graded whole. Tribe is often a backward Hindu awaiting integration.
- Cities, sadhus, and family appear in his work, so caste is not only a village custom.
Limit
- M. N. Srinivas’s field view showed dominant caste and Sanskritization as observed processes texts do not dictate.
- Andre Beteille split caste, class, and power. A. R. Desai put class first. Adivasi politics refuse Hinduisation as destiny.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IN[Indology history] --> F[Caste features endogamy] F --> H[Hinduisation of tribe] FV[Field class Adivasi] --> CR[Critique of Ghurye]
Conclusion
Ghurye’s caste is a historical, feature-rich Hindu structure. It is a necessary archive of disabilities and endogamy. It is not a sufficient map of living rank, class, or tribal self-rule.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Comment on the growing assertion of tribal community for autonomy in India
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Is Ghurye the same as Dumont?
Both use texts. Dumont theorises purity ideology. Ghurye catalogues traits and a Hindu civilisational nation.
-
Did he deny mobility?
He knew history of groups. He did not centre Sanskritization the way Srinivas did.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Instead of promoting equality in society , the present system of education itself has contributed to increased socio economic disparities" Comment . -
2020 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the New Education Policy, 2020 aim to eradicate disparities in the system of education in India? -
2019 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is POSH Act? "Identification of tormentor by women at workplace does not come easily even today". Examine the statement with substantive examples from India -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss development induced displacement in the context of tribal uprising in India. Substantiate your answer with any one detailed illustration from India. -
2017 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reason for the escalation of violence against women in the public domain ? -
2016 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Privatization of education and increasing inequalities -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emerging forms of 'inequalities' and 'acute poverty' as major challenges of social transformation in India. -
2015 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the major concerns of ethnic identity and religious identity in India?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.