Revision summary
Tribal autonomy grew against assimilation and resource displacement. Schedules, statehood and councils are constitutional paths. PESA and FRA are local self-rule tools, unevenly used. Armed conflict appears where the state is extractive first. Autonomy is citizenship with land, not exit from India.
Model answer
Introduction
Tribal assertion for autonomy is a claim to land, language, and self-rule inside the republic. It has grown as mines, dams, and parties meet older Fifth and Sixth Schedule promises.
Body
Why assertion grew
- G. S. Ghurye’s assimilation thesis treated tribe as a backward Hindu. Movements reply with a distinct political people, closer to Elwin’s protective instinct and to Nehruvian Panchsheel in words, not always in mines.
- Land alienation in Jharkhand, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh turns development into dispossession.
- Statehood, autonomous councils, and identity parties made autonomy a constitutional language, not only a revolt.
Forms
- Sixth Schedule councils in the Northeast, Bodoland-type arrangements, and Jharkhand’s long statehood movement show legal-political paths.
- PESA and the Forest Rights Act are village-level autonomy tools, still weakly implemented.
- Armed and extra-legal paths exist where the state arrives as Forest Department and paramilitary first.
Sociological reading
- Autonomy fails when integration means a labour reserve for national growth.
- It is strongest where title, council, and school sit with the community.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Displacement mines dams] --> A[Autonomy assertion] A --> S[Schedules statehood PESA FRA] G[Ghurye assimilation] --> A
Conclusion
- Growing tribal autonomy assertion is a citizenship demand: stay on land with voice. Law names Schedules, PESA, and FRA. Power on the ground still often names the mine.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine Dube's contributions to the study of Indian villages
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Is autonomy secession?
Most demands are self-rule inside India: council, land, language.
-
Does reservation replace autonomy?
It opens some offices. It does not restore alienated land.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
"Banning practice of 'Sati' is attributed to annihilation of a major social evil in colonial India." Comment. -
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the definitional problems concerning the tribal communities in India. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the colonial policy of segregation of tribes under the Government of India Act, 1935. -
2020 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyze the issues related to the citizenship in contemporary India. Give suitable illustrations. -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
What is ethno-nationalism? Examine the critical factors responsible for tribal discontent in India -
2019 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the critical issues of commercialization of higher education in India -
2019 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
What is 'social security'? Examine recent security measures adopted by the Government in India -
2018 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Examine sociological dynamics of Champaran Peasant Movement in colonial India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.