Revision summary
The project would transfer water across Himalayan and peninsular basins. Features include large storage, canals and central–state bargaining. Agriculture could gain stable irrigation and some flood moderation. Benefits will follow existing land power unless designed otherwise. Ecology, displacement and ‘surplus’ labels are the main risks.
Model answer
Introduction
The Inter-linking of Rivers project is a mega-engineering vision to move water from surplus to deficit basins through canals and dams. For agriculture it promises irrigation. Sociologically it also promises conflict over whose water and whose land.
Body
Main features
- A national water grid idea: Himalayan and peninsular components, storage, and transfer links.
- Central steering with state consent problems, because rivers are federal facts and cultures.
- Large civil works: reservoirs, canals, and power, in the lineage of planned irrigation after the Five-Year Plans.
- Environmental and displacement clearances as bottlenecks, especially in Adivasi and delta tracts.
Probable agrarian advantages
- Stabilised irrigation in drought-prone Deccan and western tracts could thicken a commercial kisan layer, as canals did in older command areas.
- Flood moderation in some donor basins and dry-season water in donee basins could cut crop failure.
- Navigable stretches and hydropower are side claims that may cheapen input movement.
Sociological cautions
- Advantages follow land: maliks and rich peasants drink first, as Thorner’s map still warns.
- Inter-state and intra-basin politics can turn a ‘national’ link into a water riot.
- Canal salinity, lost fisheries, and submerged villages can be a bane to agrarian classes who do not own the new command.
- Climate change makes ‘surplus basin’ a unstable label.
Balanced agrarian view
- Water where the field is thirsty is a real advantage if titles, ecology, and Gram Sabha consent travel with the canal.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD IL[River links dams canals] --> IR[Irrigation in deficit basins] IL --> D[Displacement inter-state conflict] L[Land class] --> W[Who drinks first]
Conclusion
Inter-linking features a national transfer grid of dams and canals. Probable agricultural advantages are irrigation stability and some flood control. Without class-fair distribution and ecological honesty, the project can reproduce Green Revolution inequality on a larger map.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Has reduction of green cover affected ecological degradation leading to global warming? Elaborate your answer with illustration
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is more water always good for farmers?
Water without drainage and fair turns can mean salinity and fights.
-
Does ILR replace local watershed work?
Mega links cannot replace tanks, soils, and village recharge.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Point out the benefits of 'green chemistry' for agrarian transformation in India. -
2020 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Do you think MSP (Minimum Support Price) Scheme for ag can help in rural development? Elaborate your response with suitable examples. -
2020 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
How can skill development programme induce social change? Illustrated. -
2019 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the challenges in Implementing the Rural Development Programmes in India -
2019 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Comment on the changing democratic profile of India -
2018 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Has Green Revolution led to the formation of new power elite in rural India? Elaborate your answer. -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a note on Basic Services to Urban Poet (BSUP) and Integrated Housing and Slum Development (IHSD) programme provided for the urban poor. -
2017 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a short note a changing means of production and increased rural poverty
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.