Revision summary
Planning directed industrialization in a mixed economy. It made poverty a state problem, not only a private fate. Class and caste shaped who took the gains. Displacement was built into big projects. After 1991 planning survives as infrastructure and welfare steering.
Model answer
Introduction
Development planning in India’s mixed economy was the state’s way to industrialise, irrigate, and promise justice without a full socialist seizure of property. It mattered as a social project. Its problems were class capture and later market drift.
Body
Importance
- Five-Year Plans sequenced steel, power, and community development so a poor agrarian society could aim at a national future.
- The mixed economy kept a public commanding height beside private capital, a heterogenetic modernizing state in Yogendra Singh’s sense.
- Planning named poverty and regional balance as public duties, not only as charity.
Social content
- A. R. Desai read planning as a bourgeois path: rich peasants and industrial houses gained more than mazdoors.
- Caste decided who entered IITs, factories, and canal commands. The plan was never a caste-blind machine.
- Displacement of Adivasis for dams showed the nation as a good that local people paid for.
Problems
- Licence-permit delays, public-sector slack, and target fetishism became textbook critiques.
- Green Revolution success was regional and class-skewed.
- After 1991 the planner became a partner of markets; inequality and informal labour grew beside GDP talk.
Prospects
- NITI-style steering, infrastructure, and rights-based welfare (work, food, education) are the afterlife of planning.
- Prospects depend on whether planning can still discipline capital for land, ecology, and care, not only crowd-in investment.
- Mixed economy remains: the state still claims to steer, now with private platforms.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FY[Five-Year mixed economy] --> G[Industry irrigation] FY --> U[Class caste unevenness] L[Liberalisation] --> N[Steering as infrastructure welfare]
Conclusion
Development planning was important because it made directed change a republican duty in a mixed economy. Its problems were uneven class-caste gains and displacement. Its prospect is a slimmer but still political steering of growth toward inclusion.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Highlight the main features of the 'Inter-linking of Rivers' project in India. What could be its probable advantages to Indian agriculture?
Next question in the 2019 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Did planning fail because it was socialist?
It was mixed-economy planning. Social failure was uneven inclusion.
-
Is there a prospect after markets?
Yes, if the state still plans land, care, and ecology, not only GDP slides.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Education is a key to social development. Elucidate -
2024 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Critically examine the relevance of development planning in India -
2021 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Analyze the idea of developmental planning in India -
2021 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the sociological significance of the New Education Policy and its thrust on vocationalization and skill development -
2021 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
The problem of displacement is inherent in the idea of development. Analyze the statement critically -
2020 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss in detail the main issues of development planning in mixed economy like India -
2018 · Q6(a) · Sociology GS 2 · 20 marks
How do you relate the growth of development of metropoles and its impact on the mental and social life of people in India. -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Write a note on Education and equality in India.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Elaborate Srinivas's views on religion and society among the Coorgs
Religion and Society
Srinivas studied Coorg religion as observed social structure. The okka and ancestor cult knit kin and land. Hinduism appears as graded ritual interaction, not a church of equals. Sanskritization and local dominance already organise prestige. The monograph founds his later field view of Indian society.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Illustrate the contribution of the Tebhaga Movement to the peasants struggle in India
Social Movements in Modern India
Tebhaga demanded two-thirds of the crop for the sharecropper. Kisan Sabha organisation made it a mass peasant movement in Bengal. It placed class tenancy at the heart of the freedom-era agrarian question. Women and bargadars joined harvest defence. Its unfinished legal lesson returned in Operation Barga.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2019 · Sociology GS 2 · 10 marks
Examine the changing initiatives of the land tenure system in India
Rural and Agrarian Social Structure
Colonial settlements created landlord, ryot, and village-share grids. Abolition, tenancy laws and ceilings cut intermediaries unevenly. Rich peasants and reverse tenancy recast who commands surplus. Operation Barga and FRA try to title tillers and forest dwellers. Records still lag the field.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.